Prince Harry is reportedly displeased with his father's choice to leave him out of the succession plans, as indicated by a royal expert. It has come to light that King Charles has commenced the process of succession planning following his cancer diagnosis last month. Sources suggest that the plans primarily revolve around his eldest son, Prince William, while Prince Harry has been overlooked for any significant involvement. In an interview with the Mirror, royal author Tom Quinn expressed his belief that the urgency in succession planning, brought about by King Charles' health condition, has left Prince Harry feeling dissatisfied.
Quinn further elaborated that the accelerated succession planning, which is taking place at least five years earlier than initially envisioned, is focused on propelling William and Kate forward swiftly. He emphasized that the idea of William being unable to assume the role of king is a nightmare scenario that nobody wants to entertain. If Prince Harry were to assume a regent role, Quinn noted that Princess Kate might not be supportive of the notion of Harry and Meghan in such positions.
However, he remarked that Kate is pragmatic and would likely comply if the royal establishment deems it necessary. Quinn highlighted Kate's image as a dutiful and uncomplaining princess, which is one that she wouldn't want to jeopardize. Speaking about Prince Harry's sentiments regarding his exclusion from the succession plans, Quinn suggested that Harry himself bears some responsibility for his choices and the consequences they entail.
Quinn cautioned that seeking freedom comes at a price, and Harry is now experiencing the repercussions. In the event of unforeseen circumstances where Charles and William are unable to fulfill their roles, Quinn stated that Harry could potentially be called upon to assist as a regent. He emphasized that such decisions would be made with careful consideration within the constitutional framework.
However, Quinn clarified that Harry assuming a regent role would not elevate Meghan to the position of queen; she would simply hold the title of the regent's spouse. To illustrate this point, he referenced Caroline Brunswick, who became queen only when the prince regent ascended to the throne in 1820, emphasizing that individual popularity or family disputes do not dictate constitutional matters. Therefore, while Prince Harry may be discontented with his current exclusion from the succession plans, his future roles within the monarchy remain uncertain, subject to evolving circumstances and constitutional protocols.
