The verdict, delivered by retired High Court Judge Sir Peter Lane, affirmed the legality of stripping Harry of taxpayer-funded security. Yet, Harry's legal team swiftly announced plans to appeal, citing perceived injustices in the decision-making process. They assert that Harry was unjustly excluded from a critical risk assessment, orchestrated by a decision-making body named RAVIK, comprising the Home Office, the Royal Household, and the Metropolitan Police.
Unveiling Meghan's alleged motive, Harry's lawyers hint at a deeper vendetta against the Home Office, orchestrated by Meghan herself. Since relinquishing their roles as working royals and relocating to the US, Harry and Meghan have found themselves at odds with the establishment. Meghan, driven by a thirst for retribution, purportedly seeks to undermine the institution she believes has wronged her.
Yet, amidst the intrigue, let us not overlook the genuine concerns for safety expressed by Harry for his family. Despite setbacks in court, Harry remains resolute in his pursuit of justice and security for his loved ones. However, the revelations expose a darker side to Meghan, portraying her as a vindictive mastermind manipulating events to settle personal scores, even at the expense of her husband.
