Although Meghan's life seemingly improved after marrying Harry, her behavior has cast a shadow over his image. Initially, I saw Meghan as someone working her way up to wealth and influence, a typical rags-to-riches story. However, as time passed, it became clear that she was not what she seemed.
Before the engagement interview, I had never heard of Meghan or seen "Suits". Even their first joint film made me feel uneasy. I thought I might be mistaken or too distrustful and sympathetic. However, as time went on, these feelings didn't vanish. It was clear to me that Meghan was less innocent and even more sinister than she appeared.
The parallels with Wallace Simpson may not be as baseless as they initially seemed. While the two women lived in completely different times, they were both viewed as foreign invaders who corrupted their royal husbands and resorted to scandalous actions to gain attention.
Meghan's post-marriage actions often seem like attempts to take control, sometimes at the expense of Harry's family and his public role. She lived like a normal person before her marriage but erupted like a volcano thereafter. This transformation from a seemingly perfect girl to a toxic public persona seems to have happened due to a mixture of factors, including power, influence, and perhaps some inner character traits that were eventually revealed to the public.
Wallace Simpson and Meghan Markle have some similarities. They were both Americans, both divorcees before marrying into royal blood. But Wallace was always neat and polite, while some critics say that Markle demonstrated a lack of calm manners.
Meghan's style and public comportment during her engagement interview did not impress many. Her speech lacked the weight or significance that could be expected from a future royal fiancée. These signs were immediately perceived as reasons for distrust in Meghan's new role and family, and increased speculations regarding the volatility of the engagement.
However, with time, her performance improved, and public opinion towards her became more favorable. This suggests that the initial impression was either overly critical or premature.
When Meghan entered the royal family, she was initially viewed positively, seen as a way for the British monarchy to modernize its image. However, some of Meghan's actions, such as her estrangement from her family, especially the Markles, might have seemed like red flags. Many of her actions were not perceived in a good light at that moment.
I initially thought that maybe everything I saw was merely a cultural misunderstanding and Meghan was not overblowing anything on purpose. At first, I thought she was probably genuinely a good person. However, with time and increased attention to the pair's actions, major events such as Megxit, and the infamous Oprah Winfrey interview, I started having many questions.
During fact-checking of Meghan's statements during the interview, many of them quickly proved to be far from the truth. This tendency of dishonesty painted a more disturbed portrait of Meghan than the public was used to considering.
Megxit and their continued presence in the public eye, through Netflix shows, podcasts, or interviews, only solidified my opinion of them as selfish and disrespectful. Instead of embracing a wide range of opportunities and proving that the royal family could also be different, incorporating various views and practices, Meghan and Harry focused on their interests, making a series of profitable steps and manipulating the media to do so.
In my opinion, the documentary they produced seemed to promote the idea that Meghan, regardless of her sophisticated background, including an internship in an Argentinian Embassy and studies in diplomacy and international relations at Northwestern, would be overwhelmed by the royal protocol and the family's conservative nature.
The documentary made me think that Meghan and Harry have no social intelligence. It seems they lead unexamined lives and are not self-aware, which explains why they cannot understand other people's viewpoints and opinions. They do not hear anything but their grievances and live in a black and white world without shades.
Overall, from my perspective, Meghan Markle can be described as a self-sufficient personality who partners with Harry without regard to others in the story. It aligns well with my observations that Markle caused stiffness in relationships, leading to the emergence of evil spirits. Her decision-making process is not based on anything other than personal desires. From what I have seen, Meghan Markle has only dealt a blow to her reputation, herself, and falsely accused her surroundings of evil to get a minute of glory. Somehow, her consent to marry Harry was overshadowed by posting pregnancy photos during someone else's celebrations. Somehow, her expressed displeasure at a certain royal suddenly got completely dirty through manipulation.
This depiction fits into a more extensive pervasive pattern of mistrust and detestation surrounding Meghan's embrace into, and then step back from, the majestic family. It is one of the many sickening erratic whims and fancies emerging as the public continues to debate her intentions and behavior.
