Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Wrap Up Nigeria Tour with a Polo Club Reception on May 12th. Meghan opted for her third wardrobe change of the day as she and Harry enjoyed a charity polo match. She donned a beige summer ensemble, once again foregoing a bra, raising questions about her undergarment choices. The final outing took them to a polo field, a familiar setting for the affluent and privileged. The couple visited a prestigious polo club as part of a supposedly charitable event, although rumors of corruption surround its establishment since 1904.
Meghan's repeated fashion choices, including going braless, seemed deliberate despite her claims of being a role model. Settling into their seats, the couple appeared somewhat isolated from others, creating an image of detachment from reality. While Polo may hold significance for some, the lack of apparent skill or genuine interest from the individuals involved perplexes observers. Harry's military service and his involvement with the Invictus Games are now called into question, with the tour appearing more like a publicity stunt than a genuine engagement.
Royal biographer Angela Levin expressed her dissatisfaction with the royal couple's unofficial visit, describing it as phony and awful during an interview on GB News. She expressed disbelief after witnessing the first few appearances by the Duke and Duchess. Levin particularly criticized Meghan's choice of outfit during a visit to Lightweight Academy College, stating, 'If you go to a very quiet school, a religious one, you don't go with a dress that has absolutely no backing to it at all.' She also claimed that Meghan displayed rudeness during an interaction on the Nigeria tour, recounting an incident where Meghan was dismissive of a teacher and two girls who politely approached her.
Another royal expert accused Harry and Meghan of capitalizing on their connections to the royal family. Several moments during an event at the Nigerian Defense Headquarters in Abuja raised questions about their true intentions. The couple's chairs were labeled with 'Duke' and 'Duchess' instead of their first names, which led Royal expert Robert Jobson to comment, 'They seem to be clinging onto the very same thing they've been trashing. Why can't they just be themselves? This is about currency and not credibility. It should be Meghan and Harry, not Duke and Duchess. It's a shame that Harry can't be himself; after all, his mother was always simply Diana. He was good enough for her; why isn't it good enough for him?'
During the same event, Prince Harry faced criticism for inspecting troops from the Nigerian military. Video footage showed Harry receiving a ceremonial welcome before conducting the inspection. Commentator Kinsey Schofield labeled the moment as odd, stating that it was something he would have done 10 years ago before his royal titles were stripped. She expressed her thoughts on GB News, saying, 'Despite being stripped of his military titles by the late Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Harry in Nigeria was seen inspecting the troops. This is odd; he's not a working member of the royal family. That's something he would have done 10 years ago, and I think that's exactly what we see with Harry and Meghan. The objective, again, is to monetize off those connections.'"
