'Lady C, Archewell was found to be delinquent earlier in the year. Is it close to Archewell filing its second lot of accounts? I noticed on Charity Watch that it was noted they have not been filed. Where are the Sussex pair getting their money from to sustain their lifestyle? Is it from donations?'
Well, Harry and Meghan's Archewell cannot take donations from the public. It's one of the conditions of their charitable structure because they're part corporation, part charity. They are bound by certain rules, regulations, and laws, which they have been skirting around. In their last accounts—I have a financial genius, an accounting expert who keeps me up to date on Harry and Meghan's financial activities— the interest they earned for the year was only $222,000. So, that's the entire amount they had for the year in their investment account. Notwithstanding that fact, in their first accounts, they had approximately $11 million, and in the subsequent accounts, it was $9 million. My accounting expert says it's standard for people to move money around with smoke and mirrors like this.
However, Archewell does not have millions available on a daily basis. It had $222,000, but they spent more or less an equivalent amount on expenses. I'm not very arithmetical, and I don't have my notes in front of me.
So, they've had a maximum of $11 million that they've been playing around with and moving. It decreased from $11 million to $9 million this year. They earned quite well in their first year in the United States before they became unpopular. Each year, they will see diminishing returns, but they don't have a great deal of money. They have a massive mortgage on their house and significant expenses. Where did the money come from? I suspect some of it would have been inherited, and some came from their dealings. Of course, if you put things through corporations and charities, you save on tax. Meghan is very sophisticated; if she wanted to stop being an actress, she could become a laundress—oh, I bow down to you, Lady C. That's hilarious!
Let me tell you what's so important about being independent. I'm only going to tell you about products that I use and believe in. So, I'm excited about Verso. As soon as I entered my 40s, becoming healthy and staying healthy became critical for me. I wanted to prioritize my health, so I started the 16/8 fast. However, scientists like David Sinclair have proven that we can reverse aging with interventions beyond healthy habits. So, I wanted a product backed up by solid evidence. I've been taking Cell Biopharma's Verso for two months now. It's scientifically proven to fight aging by increasing NAD+ levels. It's genuinely transformative for me. Fasting is so much easier; I've lost fat, weight, and I'm eating less. The team at Verso tells me it's due to its blood sugar-regulating effects, leading to fewer cravings. I'm also sleeping better and feeling happier.
Verso publishes third-party testing from each batch to guarantee you're getting what you pay for. To mark the first week of Outspoken, our brilliant first sponsor, Verso, is giving you an incredible offer. Head to buy.vr.o/outspoken now and save 15% on your first order using the coupon code 'outspoken.' I'll pop that in our YouTube and Rumble description. I've already heard from some of you that the delivery comes really fast too.
Use the coupon code 'outspoken.' Okay, Dave Murphy from Australia, a big fan of yours, Lady C, asks, 'Harry looks miserable to me. I think he is stuck between a rock and a hard place. But can Lady C see a scenario where Harry could return to the UK, and how would joint custody work if he chose to leave Meghan so he could still see the kids?'
I'm not sure that's a valuable question to answer because it's too complex. But in a best-case scenario, if they were divorced and he moved back to England, he would presumably see the children some of the time. They'd be allowed to come to England, and the rest of the time, he'd have to see them in California. Unless, of course, she married some billionaire and whisked off with him. But I think Meghan is going to prove to be like Angelina Jolie. There are some women who will do anything to win over a man, and children are fair game. They will use the children. I have little doubt that if there was a divorce, unless it was in Meghan's worldly interest, she would bend over backwards to be as nasty as possible. That's just her personality. It's why Harry was so stupid to move away because obviously, it means the jurisdiction is in California, which is bad for him. It's virtually impossible for him to come back; he's trapped.
Elizabeth Bird asks, 'Why on earth is Harry trying to get back to London? There's this rumor, Lady C, that he wants to find a way back. Does Lady C believe that Harry and Meghan are, in fact, separated?'
I don't believe a thing that comes out of Harry and Meghan's mouth. They were trying to say last year that they were separated, and I said at the time, I'd heard it from two very loud sources, but I wasn't prepared to believe it until I saw it happen. I know their marriage is volatile and up and down, which it would be because they're both unstable and volatile individuals. But I don't think it's positively volatile. It's not an Italian marriage where you argue and then hug and make up. It's all thunder, but no lightning strike. I think their marriage is toxic. Two toxic personalities, when they're not fighting everybody else, will be fighting each other.
Kathleen O'Mahone asks, 'I would like to know, were Meghan's children born of her body or via surrogate?' This is something you cover in the updated edition of your brilliant book. Of course, Dan, you know we have to be very careful how we answer that; otherwise, it could cause massive legal and financial issues. Let me put it this way, Meghan's performance during her pregnancy was very bizarre. Whatever went on was definitely not normal. Whether it was Meghan padding or playing with the size of her bump or something else, there is a story there to come out. I feel sorry for the royal family because they have been and will be injuriously affected by this. This is possibly why she has played things the way she has. It's a malicious and destructive behavior that she thought would put the royal family in a no-win situation. If the royal family had a bit of gumption, they could use all of this to put her in her place. It would take great courage, though, because if not handled properly, it could rebound adversely. They are mindful that Meghan has played the color card from the start. Anything to do with the children and how they came into existence, or doubts about it, could have racial implications. Women of color give birth every day without any irregularities or speculation. I've never known another woman, with or without color, to perform a pregnancy the way Meghan did. That bump had more ups and downs than Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton's marriage.
You're on fire today, L. Here is, oh, I bowed down to you, Lady C. My goodness, that's hilarious. What's so important about being independent is I'm only going to tell you about products that I use and believe in. I'm so excited about Verso. As soon as I entered my 40s, becoming healthy and staying healthy became critical for me. I wanted to prioritize my health, so I started the 16/8 fast. However, scientists like David Sinclair have proven that we can reverse aging with interventions beyond healthy habits. I wanted a product backed up by solid evidence. I've been taking Cell Biopharma's Verso for two months now. It's scientifically proven to fight aging by increasing NAD+ levels. It's genuinely transformative for me. Fasting is so much easier; I've lost fat, weight, and I'm eating less. The team at Verso tells me it's due to its blood sugar-regulating effects, leading to fewer cravings. I'm also sleeping better and feeling happier. Verso publishes third-party testing from each batch to guarantee you're getting what you pay for. To mark the first week of Outspoken, our brilliant first sponsor, Verso, is giving you an incredible offer. Head to buy.vr.o/outspoken now and save 15% on your first order using the coupon code 'outspoken.' I'll pop that in our YouTube and Rumble description. I've already heard from some of you that the delivery comes really fast too.
That's good news! It's buy.vr.o/outspoken. Use the coupon code 'outspoken.' Okay, Dave Murphy from Australia, a big fan of yours, Lady C, asks, 'Harry looks miserable to me. I think he is stuck between a rock and a hard place. But can Lady C see a scenario where Harry could return to the UK, and how would joint custody work if he chose to leave Meghan so he could still see the kids?'
I'm not sure that's a valuable question to answer because it's too complex. But in a best-case scenario, if they were divorced and he moved back to England, he would presumably see the children some of the time. They'd be allowed to come to England, and the rest of the time, he'd have to see them in California. Unless, of course, she married some billionaire and whisked off with him. But I think Meghan is going to prove to be like Angelina Jolie. There are some women who will do anything to win over a man, and children are fair game. They will use the children. I have little doubt that if there was a divorce, unless it was in Meghan's worldly interest, she would bend over backwards to be as nasty as possible. That's just her personality. It's why Harry was so stupid to move away because obviously, it means the jurisdiction is in California, which is bad for him. It's virtually impossible for him to come back; he's trapped.
Elizabeth Bird asks, 'Why on earth is Harry trying to get back to London? There's this rumor, Lady C, that he wants to find a way back. Does Lady C believe that Harry and Meghan are, in fact, separated?'
I don't believe a thing that comes out of Harry and Meghan's mouth. They were trying to say last year that they were separated, and I said at the time, I'd heard it from two very loud sources, but I wasn't prepared to believe it until I saw it happen. I know their marriage is volatile and up and down, which it would be because they're both unstable and volatile individuals. But I don't think it's positively volatile. It's not an Italian marriage where you argue and then hug and make up. It's all thunder, but no lightning strike. I think their marriage is toxic. Two toxic personalities, when they're not fighting everybody else, will be fighting each other.
Kathleen O'Mahone asks, 'I would like to know, were Meghan's children born of her body or via surrogate?' This is something you cover in the updated edition of your brilliant book. Of course, Dan, you know we have to be very careful how we answer that; otherwise, it could cause massive legal and financial issues. Let me put it this way, Meghan's performance during her pregnancy was very bizarre. Whatever went on was definitely not normal. Whether it was Meghan padding or playing with the size of her bump or something else, there is a story there to come out. I feel sorry for the royal family because they have been and will be injuriously affected by this. This is possibly why she has played things the way she has. It's a malicious and destructive behavior that she thought would put the royal family in a no-win situation. If the royal family had a bit of gumption, they could use all of this to put her in her place. It would take great courage, though, because if not handled properly, it could rebound adversely. They are mindful that Meghan has played the color card from the start. Anything to do with the children and how they came into existence, or doubts about it, could have racial implications. Women of color give birth every day without any irregularities or speculation. I've never known another woman, with or without color, to perform a pregnancy the way Meghan did. That bump had more ups and downs than Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton's marriage.
