Prince Harry is currently enjoying a solo trip in New York before heading to the UK for the WellChild Awards, an event he attends almost every year. Much of the media attention is focused on Harry appearing relaxed and in his element during this solo outing, which some view as an opportunity for him to rehabilitate his image without Meghan by his side. I must say, he does seem more at ease when he’s on his own. Part of this dynamic is due to Meghan's tendency to maintain constant physical contact with him, which can distract him from fully engaging in any event. Whether they’re greeting people or shaking hands, she seems to always be touching him, which surely occupies his mind to some extent.
Being alone allows him to focus more and genuinely immerse himself in his solo engagements, where we often see him at his most jovial. It seems beneficial for both of them to explore more independent activities instead of always being a package deal. They have very different experiences, skills, and interests that they could bring to the table if they diversified their engagements.
During their recent trip to Colombia, for example, it felt odd that the country’s vice president had her partner involved in every activity simply because Harry and Meghan were also present. It’s unusual for someone in a political office to have their spouse tag along for every event. While it’s common for presidents to have their spouses at formal occasions, it’s rare for them to attend all meetings, especially those with foreign dignitaries. The constant togetherness of Harry and Meghan doesn’t come across well, leaving room for speculation about why they spend so much time away from their children, despite frequently discussing their commitment to being present in their lives.
A more balanced approach, with Harry and Meghan doing separate engagements, would not only create a more consistent schedule but would also ensure that one of them is home with their kids. This strategy could help them avoid criticism regarding their parenting and allow them to function better in the public eye.
However, I doubt this change in approach will last. There’s much speculation that Meghan wasn’t invited to these events, which may have been an effort by organizers to encourage Harry to attend solo. Another rumor circulating is that Harry might be seeking to re-establish ties with the royal family, which could explain his recent inclination for solo engagements—to prove he can manage on his own and offer value to his family.
Yet, I believe it’s unlikely that the royal family desires Harry back in the fold. While many suggest that King Charles would always keep the door open for Harry out of love, allowing him to return as a working member would carry significant risks and criticism, especially if he maintains ties to projects in California through Meghan.
Even as Harry seems to be receiving a slightly more favorable reception in the media during this solo trip, he continues to rely on patronizing platitudes without offering tangible solutions. After years of public speaking, he still seems to recycle the same messages without introducing new ideas or actions, which can come across as insincere. This pattern will likely persist until he begins to demonstrate genuine change.
Shifting gears, let’s discuss the ongoing controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s workplace demeanor. There have been rebuttals to the negative portrayals of her, but let’s revisit the original Hollywood Reporter article. Many viewers have wondered if it’s true that Meghan has made grown men cry at work. While it’s conceivable that her feedback could have upset someone, I suspect that rather than outright scolding someone, her comments may have been more indirect—perhaps rude enough to leave someone feeling insulted and frustrated, leading to tears.
It’s common for employees to feel unable to defend themselves against difficult bosses, especially those with narcissistic tendencies, who can charm when necessary but also deliver cutting remarks in subtle ways. This dynamic can lead to situations where employees leave interactions feeling hurt or belittled, which may explain some of the reports of staff feeling mistreated.
Despite the positive accounts of their experiences, it’s crucial to recognize the consistent pattern of employees describing Harry and Meghan as challenging to work for due to their unpredictable demands and unrealistic expectations. When Harry and Meghan ask others to publicly defend them, it creates a conflicting narrative for readers. It’s possible for them to be supportive while still making the workplace environment difficult.
As consumers of this information, we should remember that every employee’s experience can vary widely. Some may find Harry and Meghan supportive, while others might struggle under their demanding leadership styles. This disparity explains the conflicting reports circulating in the media.
In response to the original Hollywood Reporter article, another article suggested that much of Archwell's work is done virtually, indicating that Meghan may not have been as present in the office as portrayed. However, it’s essential to acknowledge that individuals may have witnessed her behavior during in-person events, which could have influenced their impressions.
Lastly, there’s a rumor circulating that Meghan intends to write her memoir. Traditionally, memoirs are reserved for those with significant life experiences or lessons to share, which makes me question the timing. If Meghan’s previous projects serve as any indication, her memoir might also be filled with exaggerations and misleading narratives.
Sources close to the Sussexes suggest that, due to negative media portrayals, it’s time for Meghan to set the record straight. However, I would argue that they are outcasts not due to media narratives but because of their own actions—constantly criticizing the royal family and others has led to their current position. If they had left quietly without disparaging their family, they may not be facing such negativity today.
