The group of companies that are apparently allowing Meghan Markle to merchandise off of them. People have criticized me for calling Meghan a "celebrity," but it’s the best term for someone high-profile who’s being used to make money. These companies give her merchandise to wear in public, get photographed, and promote their products. There are various theories about how she’s compensated, but I find it troubling that, considering her public profile and reputation, these companies continue to partner with her.
What really caught my attention is the situation with bags allegedly crafted by women in Rwanda or other parts of Africa. These bags are then finished in Italy and sold for very high prices. I’d prefer to see Meghan invest in helping these women start their own businesses and learn how to complete the entire production process themselves, rather than just doing preliminary work. It would be more in line with Archwell’s mission to truly uplift these communities.
The other aspect to consider is that Meghan’s previous ventures, like Clever Blends, faced issues too. Clever Blends was sued for having lead in their coffee, and while the settlement was confidential, it raised concerns. Additionally, other investments like CA Sesta have also been criticized. Overall, I’m not impressed with the companies Meghan is involved with.
Moving on to my Royal Zero of the Week: Prince Harry. He traveled to the UK this week for his uncle Lord Fellowes's funeral, and Royal News Network was first to report his arrival. Here’s the issue: Harry is fighting for UK taxpayer-funded security and claims it’s too dangerous for him to visit without it. Yet, he managed to come and go from the UK without anyone knowing until after the fact. This undermines his argument and could significantly hurt his case.
John, do you agree that Harry’s actions might damage his security case?
You make a good point, Steph. It’s possible that Harry’s recent actions could impact his case. If he followed the 28-day notice requirement for security and was provided protection, it might not damage his case. However, if he showed up on short notice and received security, it could indeed weaken his argument that he needs enhanced protection at all times.
To be fair, your point also complicates his case. If the current system allowed him to get security on short notice, it might suggest that the existing process is sufficient. Harry’s challenge seems to be with having to follow the rules and not being able to have immediate security arrangements, which could make his case seem less compelling.
That’s a fair assessment. It’s clear that Harry is frustrated with having to follow protocols and wishes for more flexibility. His reluctance to adhere to the established procedures might reflect his dissatisfaction with the current system.
