Megan Markle was seen chatting with attendees inside a venue but was later escorted out through a side door by a staff member. This raised suspicions that she did not purchase a seat at the table and only appeared for the red carpet, aiming for maximum exposure.
Megan Markle has lost yet another significant media ally. Liz Jones, a prominent columnist for the Daily Mail, has supported Markle for a long time, but her recent writings reveal a startling shift. “I've always backed Megan, but the red dress pictures have led me to a startling realization, and I can no longer support her,” Jones stated. Despite having invested years in their relationship, she acknowledged that she had overlooked numerous red flags. “I was loyal because she’s a woman I saw as self-made, outspoken, and bullied by the media,” Jones explained. However, it was Markle’s appearance in a red dress at the Children’s Hospital Gala in Los Angeles that prompted her to reconsider.
Jones continued, “I suddenly found myself cringing with secondhand embarrassment when I saw those pictures. Once you have that feeling, you cannot go back. I had high hopes for Megan, but now I feel foolish.” She emphasized her dedication to sisterhood and supporting women, recalling how she defended Markle during her struggles. “I defended Megan when she spoke about her suicidal thoughts while others criticized her for looking perfectly fine at the Royal Albert Hall,” Jones said. However, her patience has now worn thin: “Megan, you’re dumped. If only I knew how to block you, I would do that too.”
YouTube sensation Taz joined the conversation, highlighting the fallout from what was a disastrous night for Markle. “Megan's actions at the event were clearly for PR purposes. How low can you go?” Taz asked, noting that losing someone like Liz Jones, a longtime supporter, was significant. “Despite everything, I never thought anything could turn Liz Jones against Megan, but she’s decided she can no longer support her.”
The discussions continued as they highlighted Markle’s dress, which had previously received criticism when she wore it to the Intrepid Valor Awards in New York back in 2021. “That dress received a lot of bad press then,” Taz recalled. “Even with the alterations, it’s still unflattering on her. Wearing it again at a children’s hospital charity gala seemed inappropriate.”
The attire and the event itself brought forth questions about Markle’s intentions. “What are you hearing about what happened that night?” Taz asked. Reports suggested she wasn’t invited and had not paid for a seat, leading to her being escorted out. “It appeared she only showed up for publicity,” Taz stated.
Details began to emerge about Markle’s appearance at the gala. Initially thought to be a plus-one for her friend Kelly McKeown, who is a heart ambassador for the hospital, it later became clear that Markle did not engage with the event. “Photographs showed no sign of her at the tables, and she was only seen briefly inside,” Taz explained.
Despite her limited presence, the narrative surrounding Markle’s appearance shifted when People magazine reported it as a surprise. However, the wording suggested she was merely present for photo opportunities. “This narrative seems deliberate,” Taz noted, referring to the term “escorted out,” which implies a more negative connotation regarding her presence at the event.
The hosts shared a photograph from the event, comparing Markle’s look to her past appearances on “Deal or No Deal.” “It’s almost like she’s given up on royalty and just wants to be a C-lister again,” Taz remarked. They discussed how Markle’s behavior on the red carpet differed from other celebrities, who typically greet the press and enter the event rather than seeking out individual photo ops. “She ran up and down the carpet trying to get as many pictures as possible,” Taz observed.
Moreover, Markle’s comments about having friends whose children were being treated at the hospital raised eyebrows. “She claimed to have school friends whose kids used the hospital, but that’s a stretch. She has ghosted most of her old friends,” Taz explained. “There’s no emotional connection in her statements, almost as if she’s pretending to care.”
The hosts concluded that the event was a significant misstep for Markle. “This was clearly a PR stunt that backfired,” Taz remarked. “It appears that the couple is now on different paths professionally, with Harry focusing on his patronage work and Meghan more concerned with her entrepreneurial efforts.”
As the discussion wrapped up, it became evident that Markle’s public persona was faltering, as was her support from allies in the media.
There's a significant issue at hand regarding digestive health, and it's not improving. Recent insights reveal that many common foods, often labeled as "healthy," might contain a potential toxin contributing to these digestive problems. According to Dr. Gundry, a world-renowned cardiologist, this toxin is affecting millions of people across the nation.
Common symptoms include weight gain, fatigue, digestive discomfort, joint stiffness, and even skin issues. Dr. Gundry points out that these side effects can easily be misinterpreted as normal signs of aging. Digestive problems often develop over years, sometimes decades, leading many to dismiss their severity. However, he assures us that the damage caused by these so-called health foods is anything but normal.
Now, shifting gears, let’s talk about Ashley Hansen, who seems to be a bit of an enigma. She reportedly quit her position in December—there was a story either in *The Times* or *The Telegraph* confirming this. However, it appears she's now left Archwell for a second time, making her the only person to have quit twice. This situation raises questions, especially given the overly flattering testimonials claiming that Meghan is practically saintly. If she were indeed such a wonderful boss, wouldn’t her staff want to stay?
The communications secretary has stepped down, likely aware that the media landscape has turned against them. Notably, even Liz Jones, *The Hollywood Reporter*, and *Newsweek* have shifted their perspectives. Their media presence is dwindling, with only a few magazines, like *People* and *Us Weekly*, still maintaining a positive view.
Harry's recent trip to Africa followed his visits to New York and the UK. It seems he wants to reconnect with the respect he once garnered on the continent. Many people fondly remember his genuine connection to South Africa, where he appeared to leave part of his soul.
For a time, it seemed like Harry might focus on doing good in Africa, especially after meeting Meghan, who also loved the region. However, her visits have been limited since their marriage, and it appears that she is no longer interested in returning to those places.
Harry’s decision to return to Africa could be viewed as a strategic move to reclaim his former royal image. While he may genuinely enjoy the warmth of the royal family there, it’s hard to ignore the possibility that he might be using these opportunities for publicity, similar to the staged photo ops attempted in Nigeria and Colombia.
The contrast between Harry’s recent public appearances and the genuine moments from his father, King Charles, is stark. Harry attempted to recreate a spontaneous group hug with local children, reminiscent of a heartfelt moment between King Charles and the New Zealand rugby team. However, his approach came off as rehearsed and insincere.
It’s important to recognize that both Meghan and Harry may be leveraging these public interactions for their own gain—whether it’s Meghan using children for photo opportunities or Harry seeking viral content.
In other news, there are worrying updates regarding King Charles's attendance at next month's COP29 climate conference. His absence seems to stem from the need to renew his cancer treatment, which he paused for his upcoming tour of Australia. This is a stark reminder that King Charles remains in an ongoing health battle.
While the public doesn’t need to know every detail about his health, it’s natural to have concerns, especially given the challenges of international travel during cancer treatment. The decision to prioritize his health is commendable, particularly as he embarks on an important trip to Australia, which I personally prefer over the politically charged COP conferences.
