Harry and Meghan Face Criticism Over LA Wildfire Visit as José Andrés Defends Their Efforts
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have once again found themselves at the center of controversy following their visit to assist victims of the recent Los Angeles wildfires. Meghan Markle and Prince Harry made headlines after partnering with World Central Kitchen to support affected communities. While some praised their efforts, others, including vocal critics, labeled the visit as a “PR stunt.”
However, this defense has sparked heated debates, with critics like Angela Levin condemning both the couple and those who support their actions.
Levin, a royal commentator, accused Harry and Meghan of leveraging the wildfire victims as “props” in their ongoing battle to remain relevant. She suggested that their visit was a calculated move to generate positive press amid their reported struggles with public perception and alleged Netflix deal challenges.
Comparisons were drawn between the Sussexes and other members of the royal family. Critics pointed out that while Harry and Meghan were accused of staging photo ops, other royals like Prince William and Catherine, Princess of Wales, have been quietly working on long-term initiatives such as homelessness solutions and early childhood education.
Meghan was particularly criticized for her visible gestures of compassion, which some argued were reminiscent of Princess Diana’s approach to humanitarian efforts. However, detractors claimed these actions lacked authenticity, with one commentator stating, “Diana’s compassion was genuine—she didn’t need cameras to validate her kindness.”
The timing of the couple’s visit also raised eyebrows. With their media presence reportedly waning and public scrutiny intensifying, skeptics questioned whether this appearance was a genuine act of charity or a calculated PR move to regain favor.
Levin and others contrasted Harry and Meghan’s approach to that of other non-working royals, such as Zara and Mike Tindall, who have managed to maintain a positive public image while staying largely out of the spotlight. Princess Anne and Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh, were also highlighted as examples of royals who perform hundreds of engagements annually with little fanfare.
Supporters of Harry and Meghan, however, argue that their actions should be seen for what they are: an attempt to help during a crisis. Andrés, in particular, emphasized the couple’s commitment to meaningful causes, suggesting their work often goes unrecognized in the U.S.
As the debate continues, it’s clear that the Sussexes remain polarizing figures, with every public appearance sparking conversations about authenticity, relevance, and the evolving role of modern royals. Whether their efforts are seen as genuine or performative, their ability to command attention is undeniable.
