Honestly, it’s heartbreaking—especially when we consider Princess Diana’s legacy.
It’s one thing to fight for justice, but it’s entirely different to drag your mother’s memory into every battle. Would Diana really have wanted this for her son? Would she have wanted to see Harry become someone seemingly consumed by lawsuits and grievances?
Let’s take a moment to remember Diana, the People’s Princess—a woman who transformed the monarchy through love, compassion, and genuine connection with people. She didn’t rely on lawsuits to make her point. She didn’t drag others down to elevate herself. Instead, she led by example, becoming a force for good by dedicating her life to true humanitarian work.
Fast forward to today, and we have Earl Spencer publicly stating that Diana would be proud of Harry’s legal victories. But would she? Would she really take pride in seeing her son spend his life in courtrooms rather than carrying forward her legacy of compassion and service?
What’s troubling is how Harry seems to use Diana’s memory as both a shield and a weapon in his battles. He’s dragged not only William but also King Charles into these disputes. It’s as if he’s forgotten that Diana was their mother, too. William lost Diana just as much as Harry did, but look at the stark contrast in how he honors her memory.
William has chosen to focus on positive action—his work on mental health initiatives, his commitment to homelessness causes, and his dedication to the British people. Meanwhile, Harry seems trapped in a cycle of conflict, unable to move forward.
And then there’s Meghan Markle’s influence in all of this. Let’s be honest: the Harry we knew before—who founded the Invictus Games, who supported veterans, and who had a warm relationship with his family—feels like a distant memory. That Harry has been replaced by someone who appears obsessed with settling scores.
Diana faced far more scrutiny in her time, but she didn’t let it define her. She rose above it all, using her platform to champion causes close to her heart—whether it was spending time with AIDS patients, supporting landmine victims, or comforting sick children in hospitals.
The most heartbreaking part of this is Harry’s apparent belief that he’s honoring Diana’s memory by fighting these legal battles. But Diana’s legacy wasn’t about fighting the media; it was about rising above the chaos and doing good in the world. Her message was clear: the best revenge is living well and helping others.
While William and Catherine focus on showing Diana’s grandchildren the power of service, Harry and Meghan seem to be creating a different narrative—one dominated by grievances and accusations.
It’s impossible to ignore the glaring contrast between William and Harry’s approaches to their mother’s memory. William has carried forward her legacy by championing causes close to her heart. The Diana Award, his mental health initiatives, and his efforts to support the homeless reflect Diana’s values. Harry, on the other hand, seems to have reduced Diana’s legacy to a weapon in his ongoing battles with the media.
And where is Meghan in all of this? Despite never having met Diana, her memory seems to be at the center of the Sussex narrative. It often feels as though Diana’s story is being used to justify their actions and gain sympathy.
The saddest part is how this drama impacts Diana’s legacy within the royal family. King Charles has worked hard to honor Diana’s memory in his own way, particularly in his role as a grandfather. William and Catherine are instilling Diana’s values in their children, teaching them about compassion and service.
In contrast, Harry’s children are growing up in an environment dominated by conflict and litigation. What will they learn about their grandmother—her compassion, her dedication to helping others, her genuine love for humanity—or just the court battles?
If Harry truly wants to honor Diana’s legacy, he needs to step away from the lawsuits and focus on the kind of work she was known for: helping others, championing meaningful causes, and using his platform for positive change. There’s still time for him to turn things around, to repair relationships with his family, and to focus on what truly matters.
Diana wouldn’t have wanted this division among her sons. She would have wanted them united, working together to make a difference in the world. The British public sees through the noise—they remember the real Diana: the woman who changed the world not through lawsuits, but through love and compassion.
Let’s hope that one day, Harry can find his way back to the values his mother lived by. After all, honoring Diana’s legacy means more than just invoking her name—it means living her message of love, service, and humanity every single day.
