And now, the U.S. media is finally paying attention. This is monumental! Radar Online has just dropped a bombshell report about Harry and Meghan being caught in a surrogacy scandal. And what’s grabbing everyone’s attention is how Meghan is being described—as a "clout-chasing wife." Remember when saying something like that could get you canceled faster than a royal press release? Well, times are changing, and the truth seems to be pushing its way into the open.
Let’s take a moment to reflect on how Catherine, the Princess of Wales, handled her pregnancies. When she had George, Charlotte, and Louis, she proudly stood on the hospital steps, glowing with authenticity, just like any woman who had given birth. The press was there. The public was there. Everything was transparent.
But with Meghan, things are different—and not in a way that inspires confidence. Do you remember the palace announcing Meghan was in labor seven hours after Archie was reportedly born? Then, in Prince Harry’s memoir Spare, he revealed they were home at Frogmore Cottage just two hours after the birth. For anyone familiar with childbirth, that timeline feels... unusual, to say the least.
The mystery doesn’t end there. Archie and Lilibet, sixth and seventh in line to the throne, have been shielded from public scrutiny in a way that raises eyebrows. If there’s nothing to hide, why so much secrecy? Even Lady Colin Campbell, known for speaking her mind, has voiced concerns. She’s calling this a "conspiracy of silence" and demanding transparency about the line of succession.
And let’s not forget the controversial photos. One day, Meghan’s baby bump appeared high, the next day low, and sometimes it even seemed to vanish. There was even a moment when it appeared to slip—an incident that had skeptics raising their eyebrows.
Here’s the big question: If there’s concrete proof that Meghan carried her children, why hasn’t it been shown? If you were accused of something this significant and had the evidence to clear your name, wouldn’t you share it? The silence is deafening.
Even the birth certificate situation adds fuel to the fire. Meghan amended Archie’s certificate 11 days after it was filed to include her title, "Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex." The irony is striking, considering she later claimed the title was a burden.
What’s most fascinating is how the American media—long Meghan’s staunch defender—is starting to question things. Outlets like Radar Online are now willing to delve into topics they previously avoided.
Lady Colin Campbell is now calling for a palace investigation to establish the truth about Meghan’s pregnancies. Given the constitutional significance of the royal line of succession, how can anyone argue against the need for clarity?
This isn’t about being cruel or spiteful—it’s about seeking the truth. The British monarchy represents more than a family; it’s an institution with historical and constitutional importance. Transparency is essential.
As this story continues to unfold, it’s clear that the public’s curiosity won’t be silenced. Questions are being asked, and inconsistencies are being noticed. Whether Meghan and Harry respond remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: This story is far from over.
