Latest development involving Meghan’s rebranding and the mysterious appearance of a supposed Lilibet photo has me more concerned than ever.
Our favorite attention-seeker has decided to rebrand her lifestyle company from American Riviera Orchard to As Ever. Doesn’t that just sound pretentious? But here’s where things get really interesting—and by interesting, I mean deeply troubling.
Suddenly, she’s using what she claims is an image of Lilibet—a child we’ve barely seen—in her promotional materials. Doesn’t this strike you as odd? For years, Harry and Meghan have been vocal about protecting their children’s privacy. Remember Harry’s big speech about consent? Let me quote him directly: “As a dad and as parents, I think consent is a really key piece to this.”
Well, well, well… how the tables have turned. Suddenly, when there’s money to be made and attention to grab, those privacy concerns seem to vanish like smoke in the wind.
Let’s talk about the Sussex children. Many of you have been raising questions for years, and honestly, can you blame anyone for being skeptical? The timing of these rare photo appearances always seems to coincide perfectly with their latest money-making schemes.
Think about it: when was the last time we saw a clear, verifiable photo of either child? The Christmas card photos are always conveniently blurry or taken from strange angles. The birthday photos are released with such careful control that it makes you wonder. And now, suddenly, there’s this promotional shot of a child running through a field.
Come on, let’s look at the pattern here. Every time the Sussexes need attention or their relevance starts to wane, there’s a new glimpse of the children. It’s like clockwork.
While Princess Catherine is recovering with dignity and grace, and Prince William is stepping up magnificently to support both his wife and the monarchy, what are Harry and Meghan doing? They’re using a child—whether real or not—to sell jam and kitchen appliances.
The hypocrisy is staggering. Meghan had the audacity to say last summer: “Our kids are young, they’re three and five. They’re amazing, but all you want to do as parents is protect them.” Protect them from what? From the very exposure you’re now orchestrating for profit?
Let’s talk about this rebranding. American Riviera Orchard wasn’t fancy enough, apparently, so now it’s As Ever. What does that even mean? She claims Netflix is now her business partner. How convenient—the same Netflix that’s probably wondering what happened to all those promised projects.
But here’s where it gets really interesting. Social media users have been quick to point out some disturbing inconsistencies in this latest photo. As one user noted: “Why hasn’t Lilibet seemed to age in two years?” It’s a valid question, isn’t it?
Let’s consider the timing of all this. King Charles is battling cancer with incredible dignity and strength. Queen Camilla is showing what true dedication looks like, stepping up magnificently to support her husband. Princess Catherine is recovering from surgery, with Prince William demonstrating what real family values look like.
And what are the Sussexes doing? They’re using children—whether real or staged—to sell lifestyle products. It’s like those old magic shows where the magician distracts you with one hand while doing the real trick with the other. Every time there’s a significant Royal event or when the real working Royals are dealing with something important, suddenly there’s a Sussex distraction.
And let’s talk about this “Jam Is My Jam” comment. Really? This from a woman who supposedly grew up with Hollywood connections and claimed to be a successful actress. Now, she’s trying to reinvent herself as some sort of Martha Stewart meets Gwyneth Paltrow hybrid. Give me a break.
The timing of this whole rebrand is suspicious. Just when King Charles might be feeling particularly vulnerable due to his health issues, suddenly there’s this reminder about his supposed grandchildren. It’s emotional manipulation at its finest—and quite frankly, it’s disgusting.
Let’s look at the facts. Since the supposed birth of these children, how many verifiable public appearances have there been? How many clear, undisputed photos have we seen? Why are all the images either blurry, taken from strange angles, or released under such controlled circumstances?
Remember the Jubilee when they claimed the children were there, but somehow no clear photos emerged? Or the supposed birthday parties where no one seems to have attended? The pattern is clear for anyone willing to see it.
What’s particularly sad about all this is that there are real children involved in the Royal Family who are being raised with dignity and proper protection. Look at Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis. Their parents have managed to balance public interest with private protection beautifully. We see them at appropriate events, in appropriate contexts—never used for commercial gain.
Speaking of commercial gain, let’s talk about this new business venture. Meghan’s trying to sell us preserved fruits and kitchen items. This from someone who couldn’t handle Royal duties or adapt to the protocol and traditions of one of the world’s oldest institutions. But suddenly, she’s an expert on jam-making and home goods?
The contrast between her behavior and that of the real working Royals couldn’t be more stark. While Catherine focuses on her recovery and her children’s well-being, while William shoulders additional responsibilities with grace, while King Charles battles cancer with dignity, and while Queen Camilla shows what true loyalty and dedication look like—what are Harry and Meghan doing? They’re exploiting children, whether real or not, for profit.
And let’s not forget Harry in all this. Where is he? Has he completely lost his voice? The man who once spoke so passionately about protecting his family’s privacy is now apparently fine with his daughter being used in promotional materials. The transformation is truly shocking.
Remember the old Harry? The one who served his country proudly, the one who created the Invictus Games from a place of genuine compassion? Look at him now—silent while his wife uses their supposed daughter’s image to sell lifestyle products. It’s heartbreaking, really.
But here’s what really gets me: the manipulation of King Charles’s emotions during his vulnerable time. Using grandchildren—whether they exist or not—as emotional leverage against a man battling cancer is beyond low. The timing of this rebrand and the sudden appearance of this photo can’t be coincidental.
Just as the real working Royals are dealing with genuine health challenges, just as the monarchy is showing its strength through unity and dedication, the Sussexes pull this publicity stunt.
Let’s talk about the business aspect for a moment. Who exactly is the target market here? People who want to buy jam from someone who’s never shown any interest or expertise in food or preservation? People who want to purchase kitchen items from someone who’s never demonstrated any domestic skills? It’s baffling.
The more you look at this situation, the more questions arise. Why now? Why use a child’s image after years of claiming to protect their privacy? Why the sudden pivot to domestic goddess? None of it adds up.
And what about the impact on the monarchy? While the real working Royals maintain dignity and focus on service, these publicity stunts cheapen the entire institution. It’s like watching someone try to turn Royal heritage into a reality TV show.
The comments on social media have been particularly telling. People aren’t buying it anymore. They’re asking the tough questions, pointing out the inconsistencies, and questioning the convenient timing of these rare glimpses of the children.
But what really breaks my heart is thinking about the real victims in all this—the children. Whether they exist or not, if they do exist, they’re being used as marketing tools. If they don’t, well, that opens up a whole other can of worms, doesn’t it?
And what about the impact on the real working Royals? While they’re dealing with genuine health challenges, while they’re showing true grace under pressure, while they’re demonstrating what real service looks like, they have to contend with these publicity stunts from California.
My dear viewers, I know many of you have been following this saga from the beginning. You’ve seen the pattern emerge, you’ve noticed the inconsistencies, and you’ve questioned the convenient timing of these rare glimpses. And you’re right to be skeptical.
Because here’s the thing: real royalty doesn’t need to sell jam. Real royalty doesn’t use children for promotional materials. Real royalty focuses on service, on duty, on putting the institution before personal gain.
Look at Queen Camilla, stepping up magnificently during King Charles’s treatment. Look at William, balancing his increased responsibilities with supporting his wife’s recovery. Look at Catherine, focusing on her health and her children with dignity and grace. That’s real royalty.
What we’re seeing from Montecito is something else entirely. It’s celebrity culture trying to wear a royal mask—and quite frankly, the mask is slipping.
So, what’s next? Will we see more convenient glimpses of the children when sales need a boost? Will there be more rebranding when this venture inevitably fails to gain traction? Will there be more emotional manipulation of King Charles during his vulnerable time?
One thing’s for sure: we’ll be here to call it out, to question the inconsistencies, and to point out the manipulation. Because that’s what this community does. We support the real working Royals while exposing the publicity stunts and manipulation.
