Megan Markle is back in the spotlight, pulling yet another stunt that’s as transparent as her PR strategies. This time, the drama revolves around her much-hyped signet ring—the one she’s been flaunting lately, ensuring everyone knows just how “special” it is. But here’s the twist: the ring isn’t quite what she wants you to believe. In fact, it’s less about genuine royal-approved jewelry and more about spinning a story.
The cotroversy began with a Vogue article that hinted Megan’s new signet ring came from Bentley and Skinner, the prestigious jewelers to the royals. This implication made the ring seem like a historic piece, as if Megan had finally secured her place in the royal inner circle through her choice of bling. But Bentley and Skinner quickly set the record straight: the ring isn’t one of theirs.
For those unfamiliar, Bentley and Skinner is a historic jeweler with a royal warrant, meaning they’ve designed custom jewelry for the British royal family. Known for their elegant, flat signet rings that sit snugly on the finger, their designs are a far cry from the oversized, influencer-friendly pieces you’d find at brands like Brilliant Earth—a favorite among celebrities, including Megan, who was seen endorsing it at the 2023 Invictus Games.
Megan’s signet ring, however, doesn’t match Bentley and Skinner’s signature style. Despite Vogue’s subtle implication that the ring might be linked to the royal jeweler, the truth is far less glamorous. The article, written in Vogue’s classic “we’re not lying, but we’re definitely implying” style, name-dropped Bentley and Skinner as a possible source, creating the illusion of a royal connection.
The Vogue piece didn’t stop there. It went on to discuss how royals, like the late Princess Diana, have worn signet rings, subtly linking Megan’s ring to Diana’s iconic jewelry. But let’s be clear: Diana’s signet ring featured the Prince of Wales feathers, a symbol of genuine royal heritage. Megan’s ring, on the other hand, is more of a statement piece—designed to look expensive and royal-adjacent, but lacking any real historical significance.
To add to the confusion, Vogue quoted Bentley and Skinner’s brand manager, Ilias Kapasalis, making it seem as though the jeweler was directly involved in the ring’s creation. Bentley and Skinner later denied any connection, but by then, the narrative had already taken hold.
So, what’s the deal here? Is Megan Markle trying to live out her royal fantasies with a made-up backstory? Or is she attempting to convince the world that she’s still a royal-adjacent figure, despite stepping back from her royal duties? It’s hard to say for sure, but one thing is clear: Megan is a master at blending a little truth with a lot of fiction to craft a compelling narrative.
At the end of the day, Megan’s signet ring may look fancy, but the story behind it isn’t as shiny. This entire saga is yet another example of her ability to turn even the smallest detail into a headline-worthy moment. Whether it’s stretching the truth or inventing a story altogether, Megan knows how to keep herself in the public eye.
The next time you hear a rumor about Megan Markle and her jewelry, take it with a grain of salt. More often than not, it’s a press release disguised as a news story. As the saying goes, “Believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see”—especially when it comes to Megan Markle.
Megan Markle, signet ring, Bentley and Skinner, Vogue, royal jewelry, Princess Diana, PR strategies, royal family, Brilliant Earth, Invictus Games, royal warrant, celebrity endorsements.
