In a stunning revelation on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Senator Chris Murphy disclosed new details about Prince Harry’s visa controversy—details that, according to sources, directly implicate Meghan Markle in the scandal. The Connecticut senator suggested that the Duchess of Sussex played a crucial role in securing Harry’s U.S. residency under questionable circumstances, raising concerns over political favoritism, legal loopholes, and potential immigration fraud.
This shocking claim has reignited debates surrounding Meghan Markle’s growing influence in U.S. political circles and her alleged behind-the-scenes maneuvering.
Prince Harry’s move to the United States in 2020, following his and Meghan’s decision to step down from royal duties, has long sparked speculation about the legal basis of his residency. However, Senator Murphy’s statement has placed new scrutiny on how the Duke of Sussex was able to remain in the country—despite publicly admitting to past drug use in his memoir, Spare.
Under U.S. immigration law, individuals with a history of drug use can face significant hurdles in obtaining visas or permanent residency. Yet, Prince Harry appears to have bypassed these restrictions with surprising ease, leading many to question whether Meghan’s connections played a role in facilitating his smooth transition into American life.
According to Senator Murphy, compelling evidence suggests that Meghan Markle lobbied for Harry’s visa approval through high-level political channels. The senator pointed to reported communications between the Sussexes and key U.S. government officials, implying that special favors may have been exchanged to circumvent standard immigration procedures.
If true, the implications are serious—suggesting a misuse of power that granted a British royal preferential treatment over ordinary immigrants, many of whom face deportation or visa denials for far lesser infractions.
This revelation comes at a time when Meghan’s political aspirations have been widely speculated upon. Reports indicate that she has fostered relationships with influential political figures, including top Democratic donors and members of the Biden administration. Her frequent appearances at elite political events have drawn criticism, with detractors arguing that she is leveraging her royal status for personal and political advancement.
Senator Murphy’s remarks have intensified scrutiny on Meghan’s alleged role in Harry’s immigration process. He hinted that if a full-scale investigation were launched, the findings could be highly damaging for the Duchess of Sussex.
This raises significant ethical concerns—has Meghan used her growing influence to secure privileges unavailable to ordinary citizens? If proven, such actions could have severe legal ramifications, not just for Prince Harry, but for the credibility of the U.S. immigration system itself.
Public opinion surrounding Meghan and Harry remains deeply divided. While the couple has positioned themselves as victims of royal oppression, critics argue that they are simultaneously exploiting political and social connections for personal gain.
If Prince Harry’s visa approval was indeed politically motivated, as Senator Murphy suggests, it could be yet another controversy in a growing list of allegations painting Meghan as a power-hungry figure willing to manipulate the system.
As of now, the Sussexes have not responded to these allegations. However, the pressure for transparency is mounting. If Meghan did play a role in influencing Harry’s immigration status, it could not only damage her reputation but also expose serious flaws within the U.S. political and immigration framework.
One thing is clear—Meghan Markle’s influence extends far beyond the British monarchy, and the extent of her power within American political circles may be greater than anyone previously imagined.
