In an article for The Spectator Australia, he shared that the biography faced a lot of backlash, especially from royal supporters. He acknowledged that discussing Andrew’s private life was a difficult decision, but argued it was necessary to fully understand his character. The author said some details were removed out of respect for privacy and taste, yet others remained because they were seen as essential to the truth.
He also claimed Andrew’s personal choices, including his sexual behavior, were important in shaping who he became. The biographer pointed to reports of Andrew’s excessive lifestyle during official trips, suggesting it was fair for taxpayers to know. He expressed frustration that files from Andrew’s years as the UK’s trade representative (2001–2011) have still not been released, despite repeated requests.
In simple terms, the author feels his book is about accountability—questioning the actions of a public figure funded by taxpayers. While critics accuse him of invading privacy, he insists that uncovering the truth about Andrew’s conduct and finances is in the public interest.
