The discussion reignited recently when veteran royal reporter Richard Palmer responded to online backlash over a fellow journalist’s use of “Kate” instead of formal titles. The trigger? A detailed chart by royal expert Patricia Treble listing senior royals’ public engagements—referring to the Princess of Wales simply as “Kate.”
Royal Observer Weighs In With Historical Context
Palmer, known for his decades-long coverage of the Windsor family, quickly came to Treble’s defense. “I’ve seen so many people call her Kate without being disrespectful, Patricia,” he wrote. His point? Familiarity doesn’t equal irreverence.
He reminded critics that even Prince William himself has repeatedly called his wife “Kate” in public interviews—a fact that speaks volumes about the couple’s own preferences. “I can see how the palace is trying to rebrand her as a future Queen Catherine,” Palmer acknowledged, “but I just don’t think it matters much.”
This perspective from a seasoned Royal Observer carries weight. It’s not just opinion—it’s rooted in observation, repetition, and royal behavior over time.
The Origin of the Debate: Titles, Tradition, and Public Perception
The debate intensified last November when the BBC issued a public apology for referring to the Princess of Wales as “Kate Middleton” during its Armistice Day coverage. “We received complaints from people unhappy that we didn’t use the Princess of Wales’s correct title,” the broadcaster stated on November 14.
Yet, interestingly, the Princess herself appears to straddle both identities. Recently, royal fans shared images of her handwritten Christmas Carol service invitations—signed simply as “Catherine.” Not “Kate,” not “Princess Catherine”—just her given name, elegant and understated.
This nuance is key. It shows that while official roles demand formal titles, personal identity remains fluid—even for future queens.
Settled? Why the Human Side Matters More Than Protocol
At its heart, this isn’t really about semantics. It’s about how we relate to public figures. A Royal Observer like Palmer understands that language evolves—and so do royal personas.
Calling her “Kate Middleton” may reflect her pre-royal past, but it also honors the woman millions first connected with: the relatable, down-to-earth bride who entered the monarchy with grace. “Princess Catherine” reflects her current role, her growing stature, and her future as queen consort.
Both are valid. And as this debate proves, a little empathy goes further than rigid rule-following.
Final Word from the Experts
So, is the Kate Middleton vs. Princess Catherine debate truly settled? According to a trusted Royal Observer, yes—in spirit, if not in absolute rule. Context matters. Respect matters more.
Richard, you’re very kind to repeatedly explain why either Kate or Catherine is fine, especially for a graphic.
— Patricia Treble (@PatriciaTreble) December 31, 2025
I rarely engage with anonymous accounts. Too many are bots or out to deliberately stir outrage.
Whether you say “Kate,” “Catherine,” or “Her Royal Highness,” what counts is the intention behind the words. And as Palmer’s thoughtful defense shows, even the most seasoned Royal Observer knows that humanity trumps hierarchy.
