According to Wonderwall.com, the political commentator dismissed the couple’s appearance as little more than a staged “photo opportunity,” arguing they could have made the visit quietly without media attention or publicity.
“They need cameras with them”
On her April 14 podcast, the 55-year-old commentator directed sharp criticism at Meghan, 44, accusing her of turning a sensitive hospital visit into publicity.
Kelly claimed that Meghan’s visit to a children’s hospital, where young cancer patients were being treated, was orchestrated for media coverage rather than genuine charity. She argued that the couple consistently ensures cameras are present during their charitable engagements in order to receive public recognition.
She also questioned why charitable work could not be done privately, suggesting that the Sussexes appear to prioritize visibility and public applause over discretion and privacy.
Meghan and Harry, 41, visited the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne shortly after arriving in Australia on a long-haul flight from Los Angeles. They were met by members of the public gathered outside the facility.
Hospital visit and public reaction
During their roughly 90-minute visit, the couple spent time with young cancer patients, took photographs with families, toured hospital wards, and participated in therapy-related activities. They also made bedside visits to children receiving treatment.
However, the visit sparked debate online. Some social media users expressed concern about infection control, questioning whether immunocompromised children were put at risk due to close interaction with visitors and crowds. Criticism also emerged over reports that some children who had been wearing protective masks may have removed them during the encounter.
One commenter on X raised concerns about the hospital’s decisions, questioning why vulnerable patients were placed in such close proximity to large groups of visitors and asking who approved the removal of protective masks.
Another individual went further, describing the situation as a “PR stunt” and accusing the hospital of failing in its duty of care toward the children involved.
Mixed reception in Australia
The turnout for the Sussexes’ visit was relatively modest compared to the enthusiastic crowds they received during their 2018 royal tour of Australia.
Sources suggest that both Harry and Meghan were disappointed by the public and media reaction during this visit. Reports circulating before their arrival had already suggested debate over whether the trip was partly promotional, blending charitable appearances with commercial engagements.
There was also political criticism in Australia regarding the level of taxpayer-funded security provided for the couple.
Despite this, a source close to them told the Daily Mail that much of the visit was intended to focus on charity work and minimize public expense. The insider added that Prince Harry has long held a strong personal connection to Australia, describing it as a place he has always felt at home since his youth.
The source also noted that Harry closely follows media coverage about himself and was likely surprised by the intensity of the public reaction and commentary surrounding the trip.
