Donald Trump with thin skin cannot criticize Twitter
Donald Trump has about 67 million Twitter followers. I agree that the vast majority of them are in the yuk-yuk 'n' yuck factor: Can you believe what that text says today? Because it is about to pass in the morning without the free world leader beating his ass. Or he planted himself with vainglorious fame.
He gets up early in the morning, jokes about his talking talking horse, the earth trembles and the State Department - the remains of the reduced corpse of embassies - tries to put out the fires.
There is nothing that anyone can do about rescuing the British ambassador to the United States, Sir Kim Darroch, who resigned on Wednesday, three days after the Mail on Sunday distributed his leaked memos to the pages of letters that bit his ankle. “We do not really believe that this administration will be the norm; inefficiency; incomprehensible; small division of the group; very little contact with publishers. ”
One day after Trump applauded: "A clever U.S. ambassador to the United States is not a happy man, a stupid boy… I don't know the Lawyer but he was told he was a proud fool."
Darroch has been secretly talking (believing) to his government about the ropes, although he has ignored warnings from the Foreign Office - earlier in the internet - not to commit anything to the electronic wallets they do not want to see on the front page of the Daily. Email. Everything is possible Wiki-leak. And what should you do when introducing a part-time worker is primarily a job description?
Trump's tweets are sad, often unreadable and mispronounced don't take prisoners. And no one has been able to put a leash in his crazy yips.
However, like most abusers, the president can eat it, he can't take it. Willy-nilly blocks those who disagree, who raise his nose, who call him a scandal, including a former Washington Star office manager who is looking for Trump's true inspector, Daniel Dale. That should be a badge of honor, to get the Twitter ban by Trump.
Some of those posted on social media by Coventry, however, did not take the presidential suit (Russian name for one-sided declaration is appropriate) lying on the ground. They dragged Trump to court, and another lawsuit was filed against the authorities over legal challenges. Trump cannot set up a court ladder quickly enough to avoid them.
On Tuesday, the organisation's appellate court ruled that Trump had violated the constitution by banning Twitter users who criticized or ridiculed him. The U.S. Supreme Court of Appeal in Manhattan has upheld a lower court judge who ruled that Trump violated the constitution by lowering his hammer to his opponents. Basically, the appellate judges concluded that the First Amendment required a greater, if not less, way to address issues affecting the public. Golly, what a sense this is.
"The irony of all of this is that we are writing at a time in the history of this nation when the conduct of our government and its officials contradicts open, vigorous dialogue," said Barrington D. Parker, a three-member regional panel.
The debate, the decision said, creates “an unprecedented level of enthusiasm and popularity. This argument, as uncomfortable and unpopular as it may often be, is still a good thing. In resolving this complaint, we remind the plaintiffs and the public that if the first amendment means anything, it means that the best response to an unpopular speech on matters affecting the public is additional discourse, not less. ”
The decision came in a lawsuit filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which sued seven people who were blocked by Trump, because he did not like their responses to his provocative tweets.
In a verbal debate earlier this year, representatives of the Department of Justice, who represented Trump, argued that his account was set up long before he entered the White House, ergo was speaking privately while blocking those who insulted him.
Parker exclaimed: "Do you really encourage us to believe that the president is not legally holding back when he posts a message on Twitter?"
In the broader context, this decision could have an impact on how the First Amendment - the protection of free speech - could apply to the era of freedom of communication, which had never been seen by constitutional writers. In fact, they make these rules on the plane. But in this particular case, because Trump is undoubtedly using Twitter to do government business - tweeting officials, arguing with Congress via tweet - so he can’t exclude other Americans from reading his posts or replying to them.
Briefly, as Parker wrote, the First Amendment prohibits officials who use a social media account for government purposes to block people because they say things that officials find undesirable. Trump’s tweets of cockamamie always make tens of thousands of responses.
The Department of Justice has not yet decided to appeal but it seems likely that the entire dispute will end in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Ironically, the decision to transfer the region came just before the White House opened its doors to a conference that had rallied to Trump's "digital heroes" - as described by the New York Times, Trump was "disgusted". Invitations to the right wing on Thursday's confab include such as Bill Mitchell, a broadcaster who promoted QAnon's extreme extremism on Twitter (thought to be a "deep-seated" secret plot representing Trump and his supporters); Carpe Donktum, an anonymous troll winner of a competition created by the Infowars anti-media meme media organization; Ali Alexander, the "activist" who slammed Senator Kamala Harris for not being a "black American" following the first debate on the Democratic presidency; and terrorist journalist James O'Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, who tried to defraud the Washington Post on the (false) claim that a woman was conceived by Republican legislator Roy Moore at a young age, with the intention of disgracing the paper (which did not publish the article).
These are the nutbars who complain that those who keep big habits are being bullied by bullies on social media platforms like Twitter, Google and Facebook. Who, by the way, is not.
Trump wrote on Twitter on Thursday morning: “The main topic today at the White House Social Media Summit will be the extreme dishonesty, prejudice, discrimination and oppression perpetrated by certain companies. We will not let them go with us for long. Fake News Media will also be present, but limited time. ”
