Type Here to Get Search Results !

Why did the American justice reject Britney Spears' request?

 Why did the American justice reject Britney Spears' request?

Why did the American justice reject Britney Spears' request?

The artist will be heard again on July 14th.



I am traumatized ”, it is with these words that Britney Spears addressed herself to the Superior Court of Los Angeles on June 23, to testify that she has been put in place since 2008. After two years of silence, the American star had shared chilling statements about the daily life she says she has lived over the past ten years. But a week after these statements, the American justice has just refused his request to withdraw Jamie Spears, his father, from this legal agreement as revealed by NBC. For what reasons ?


An old request refused

As the American site Variety details, this refusal is a response to documents which had been sent to the Superior Court of Los Angeles more than a month ago. Before Britney Spears' explosive outings. New court documents filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Wednesday show the judge dismissed a month-old request by Spears' attorney Samuel Ingham III to dismiss his father, Jamie Spears, as his sole conservative. These documents are not in direct response to last week's hearing, ”confirms Variety.


The judge who received the testimony of Britney Spears on June 23 can not make any decision on the basis of what he heard because Britney Spears "has still not filed a motion to end her guardianship", continues Variety. The US court ruling on Wednesday states that Britney Spears is “substantially incapable of managing its financial resources or resisting fraud or undue influence”. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for July 14. It is possible that Spears will submit a request to end the guardianship at this time.


Britney Spears' father calls for investigation

For his part, Jamie Spears asked for an investigation following the accusations of his daughter, on acts of abuse and forced labor. Britney Spears also revealed that she had been refused removal of her IUD as she wanted to get pregnant again. “Unlike Mrs. Montgomery (her conservative, editor's note) and Mr. Ingham (Britney Spears 'lawyer, editor's note), Mr. Spears does not speak or meet with Ms. Spears' medical team, and he is neither authorized nor was unable to provide information about her daughter's current medical treatment, diagnosis, or therapy, ”Spears and his lawyer said in documents in response to the accusations. “Mr. Spears does not participate in or discuss Ms. Spears' personal affairs with her, such as issues relating to her personal care, marriage and reproductive desires… Mr. Spears is simply not involved in the decisions. related to Ms. Spears' personal care for medical or reproductive problems ”.

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.