The reaction to Prince Harry's admission of drug use in his book has been mixed in the US and the UK. While some individuals are advocating for his deportation from the US, others are questioning how the US government would handle similar confessions made by celebrities regarding drug use.
The revelation made by Prince Harry about his drug use in his book, as well as the request by the Spare and Heritage Foundation to make his visa application records public, have ignited an intriguing debate.
The right-wing organization is pushing for Prince Harry's removal from the United States, but there are those who are contemplating whether other celebrities, such as Drake and The Weeknd, who have admitted to drug use, would face the same consequences.
There has also been discussion regarding other foreign celebrities who have been denied entry into the US due to their drug addictions.
Critics of the organization argue that their demand is unreasonable, and it is unlikely that the government would grant such a request for visa documents, regardless of the individual's fame or lack thereof.
Furthermore, it is unknown whether Prince Harry holds a diplomatic passport, and if he does, it is unlikely that the US government would want to jeopardize its relations with the UK.
Some individuals point out that British singer Amy Winehouse was permitted to perform at the Grammy Awards in 2008 despite being denied a visa to enter the United States due to her drug addiction.
Her visa application for entry into the United States of America was rejected by the American Embassy in London.
It is believed that Prince Harry's visa application would fall under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Exemption 6, which protects information that would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project is seeking information from government authorities regarding whether the Duke of Sussex received preferential treatment from the US government.
