Wylie Stecklow, a New York-based attorney representing celebrity photographers, shared his perspective on the matter during an interview with The Mail Online. Recognizing the prince's concerns about paparazzi, Stecklow acknowledged the understandable apprehension stemming from Diana's untimely demise.
He stated, "While disregarding the royal aspect, it is reasonable for a man who lost his mother in a paparazzi-involved car accident to be extremely wary of finding himself in a similar situation."
Regarding the online video capturing the incident, Stecklow remarked, "If that is the extent of the accident they are concerned about, it does not appear to qualify as criminal behavior." He emphasized that photographers engaging in news-gathering activities related to celebrities are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
These opinions and statements coincide with similar sentiments expressed by New York lawyer Matthew Leish, who cautioned, "If Harry possesses video evidence depicting a high-speed pursuit, it might alter the circumstances." However, Leish also cautioned that privacy rights in a taxi are not recognized in New York, and claims of invasion of privacy may not hold.
In summary, experts are advising Prince Harry to abandon his court bid over the car chase incident in New York City, despite the unfortunate similarities to Princess Diana's tragic accident.
