The controversy stems from the fact that Prince Harry continues to hold onto royal titles bestowed upon him by the country he now appears to be ridiculing. These concerns and criticisms were recently raised by royal commentator Daniela Elser.
The conversation surrounding this matter arose when Prince Harry violated what is often referred to as the "golden rule" of the Royal Family, which involves refraining from making political statements. Elser believes that this action exemplifies the Duke's sense of entitlement, describing it as the "worst example" thereof.
As reported by News.com.au, Elser points out that Prince Harry is well aware that his family maintains a policy of non-involvement in politics.
Furthermore, he should also be aware that he and Meghan are no longer working members of the royal institution, and therefore should not be using the title "His Royal Highness."
However, despite this, Prince Harry used the title on his daughter Lilibet's birth certificate. In light of these actions, one might question how he dares to insult the country that many of us hold dear, while simultaneously clinging onto his title by the proverbial fingertips.
