Lady C does things she has some aptitude. She is wily and exploitative. Rachel Zane did influence Megan's fantasy. Harry's legal instincts are to his detriment. When these lawsuits started, their reputations were much better than they are today.
Now, their reputations are destroyed, and their legal viability is destroyed. Megan is continuing to make Harry more vulnerable and dependent on her. She is also strengthening her position in the event of a divorce. It is a brilliant tactic from Megan, although not admirable.
Meghan Markle's disappearance from Prince Harry's court hearings hasn't been noticed by royal observers in the UK, who think she should have stood by her husband. Prince Harry's bitter legal battle started on Tuesday when he arrived at London's High Court on Tuesday, where he was to give evidence in his lawsuit against the publisher of British tabloid The Daily Mirror, which he accuses of phone hacking and other unlawful acts.
Megan's absence was followed by both his supporters and critics, with the majority of people saying she shouldn't have shown her support to Harry, who allegedly picked his legal battles at her behest. Critics of the US-based couple wondered what sort of excuse she might have given to convince Harry that it is better for her to stay away. It was not the first time that Harry traveled to the UK alone. He recently visited the UK to attend the coronation of his father, King Charles III.
Prince Harry admitted in his memoir, 'Spare,' contradicted a claim in his witness statement at the High Court today and denied accusations that his solicitors drafted evidence for him. The Duke of Sussex said he could not remember whether he wanted to meet his mother's former butler, Paul Burrell, despite his opposition apparently causing a rift with his brother, Prince William.
When asked about an article published in December 2003, blind Andrew Green KC for former Mirror Group Newspaper MGN pointed to a discrepancy between Harry's witness statement, in which he says he didn't want to hear Mr. Burrell's reasons for selling some of Diana's possessions and giving interviews about her, and his memoir, 'Spare,' where he wrote that he wanted to fly home from his gap year job in the Australian Outback to meet him.
It came as Harry today became the first royal to testify for more than a century as part of a phone hacking trial, in which he alleges that around 140 articles published between 1996 and 2010 by Mirror Group Newspapers contain information gathered using unlawful methods.
In a day that contained a number of heated exchanges, Harry also tried to turn questions on a lawyer after the High Court was told a story subjected to one of his complaints came from a royal press release.
Andrew Green KC for Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) told the royal, 'I am here to cross-examine you. I'm afraid that's the way this works, Prince Harry.'
It came as Harry today asked about an article published in December 2003 about a possible meeting between him and his brother and their mother's former butler, Paul Burrell. The Duke told the High Court he could not remember whether he wanted to meet Burrell.
Harry said, 'The time gap between the original article and when I wrote this book was rather a large gap between the two.'
Mr. Green said, 'Your position is that at the time you didn't want a meeting, or did you want a meeting? What is the true position?'
Harry replied, 'I honestly can't remember whether I wanted a meeting or not.
