Harry admitted to a judge that he wasn't aware of any evidence suggesting he'd been hacked by a tabloid news group.
However, he argued that it would be unjust if he were denied victory in his high court phone hacking case against the publisher of the Mirror newspaper. During the session, Prince Harry also replied with "I don't remember" nine times.
The Duke called on Andrew Green KC, representing MGN, to direct his questions to his legal team instead of him on four occasions during the morning's session.
He also told Green "I'll take your word for it" several times during the grilling. Andrew Green KC for Mirror Group Newspapers suggested to the prince that he was speculating without evidence, and there were no call records to support his allegations.
On Harry's second day in the witness box at the Royals building, Mr. Green asked him if he had any evidence indicating the extent to which he had been hacked, to which Harry replied, "No, I wouldn't know. My legal team would know. That's part of the reason why I'm here, my Lord."
When asked if he claimed to have been consistently hacked by MGN between 1996 and 2010, the Duke of Sussex said, "Consistently, I wouldn't know."
During a moment of emotional intensity, Harry appeared close to tears when asked about his experience of giving evidence in the witness box by his barrister, David Sherborne. Harry paused, choked back tears, and said, "It's a lot."
At the end of the session, the judge instructed Harry not to discuss his evidence with anyone overnight. In response, Harry jokingly asked if that included his wife and children, suggesting he might connect with them through a FaceTime call.
However, on this particular day, Harry seemed on the verge of tears as he concluded his historic day and a half of answering questions at the court. The judge granted Harry permission to make a call to his wife for advice.
Harry was visibly lost, and Meghan may have been the one who encouraged him to go to court, implying she might hold the evidence. Harry attempted to FaceTime Meghan, but she didn't answer, indicating her refusal to testify or assist him in court. This situation also represents the last opportunity for Harry, as the judge broke the rule.
Despite Meghan's professed love for Harry, she left him to face the court in the UK on his own. They are living completely separate lives and only come together when it benefits their public image. If Harry were to appear as a loser, Meghan cannot risk having her name associated with it, so she stays home and keeps her distance.
This further confirms that Harry has always had everything taken care of for him, never having to think for himself. He has always had staff to handle things on his behalf. It is evident that he lacks executive function, the ability to plan, organize, follow through, and achieve goals.
Because he has never had to exercise these skills, he is struggling on the world stage, going to court without evidence. Winning without evidence would be an injustice.
Personally, I am undecided about this case. If his phone was hacked, then he should undoubtedly pursue legal action. However, winning a case without evidence goes against the principles of the justice system. How can that be possible?
