We can expect monetization of their British-themed clothing, such as smocked dresses, knee-high socks, red shoes, as well as incorporating other British elements like food, activities, and toys.
This branding strategy also serves as a deflection tactic, using their children as human shields to ward off criticism. While Alec and Hilaria Baldwin have faced backlash for similar actions, it is deemed abhorrent.
Brace yourselves for the upcoming Prince and Princess of America Blitz, as that's how they will brand and market their image. It wouldn't be surprising if WME (William Morris Endeavor) is involved in this plan, considering Meghan's association with them since signing with the agency.
There are reports of Liberty London rebranding as Liberty Los Angeles, with Meghan Markle taking on roles such as creative director, chief vision officer, muse, and victim, while the Sussex family becomes the official brand ambassadors. This seems to be Meghan's fantasy come true, as she envisions this while engaging in various activities. However, the discussion then shifts to her thoughts on punishing the nanny for letting Lily fall.
The children, particularly Lily, will play a central role in their branding of the British or Royal lifestyle. Meghan initially showed disdain for casual attire, like Kate's kids in baseball caps, emphasizing a more laid-back approach. However, she may pivot away from that and attempt to bring back the "Royal pixie dust." She now has a princess, and she'll do her best, albeit not necessarily successfully, to utilize that advantage.
As for how this affects Harry, there is a recent article by Jack Royston in Newsweek that sheds light on his concerns regarding privacy. It solely focuses on blaming the British tabloids without considering the US media's impact and the needs of his children. Some people believe that Harry is not fully on board with this branding endeavor, and it might be a boundary he drew within their marriage. Meghan has been cautious about crossing that line, knowing it could have significant consequences. Harry's core identity revolves around his aversion to fame, media attention, and the childhood trauma caused by the media, which also played a role in his mother's death.
By exposing the children, Meghan is treading on dangerous ground. That's why we often see them shown from behind or from a distance. It appears that specific instructions are given to paparazzi regarding such coverage. Meghan knows that crossing this line could have severe consequences, potentially jeopardizing their relationship. She wants to be in control of when and how their exposure occurs.
Instagram is filled with accounts featuring children, including those of celebrities and pageant moms. Meghan faces stiff competition from those who are more willing to exploit their children for personal gain, which may clash with Harry's reluctance.
Many of these children on Instagram have been exposed since infancy or possess exceptional looks or talents. Their parents actively engage in maintaining their social media presence. Personally, some may find it distasteful, but ultimately, it's not our children and not our problem. I'm just grateful that I didn't grow up in an era like this.
To be honest, I couldn't care less if the Harkles try to merge their kids. If anything, it might mean that we get to see the kids out and about occasionally. However, most people won't find it cute because the parents themselves are so unappealing. We don't have royalty here, and the average person won't be impressed by that kind of gimmick. People name their poodles "Princess" here, not their kids. Merging their children won't bring them the fame and money they crave because, let's face it, they, especially Meghan, lack talent, are lazy, difficult to work with, and simply unpleasant. And eventually, those kids will grow old enough to speak their minds, which should be interesting.
These days, it's become popular among star moms in California to have non-gendered children. Some parents with two kids in school seem to encourage them to question their sexuality. It reminds me of Sonny and Cher, where their little girl was forced to wear frilly princess clothes until she transformed into Chaz, a transgender male. Lily may face a similar fate, being forced into a Diana-like persona, possibly subjected to cosmetic surgeries, hair dyes, and blue contacts. She will easily be influenced into a non-gender or transgender life at an early age. There won't be a happy princess life for Lily. I agree that she'll likely rebel before she turns 30.
Without a doubt, these children are being exploited to generate money to support their parents' extravagant and greedy lifestyle. None of that money will truly benefit the children. Harry and Meghan will take every cent. Lily will be coerced into undergoing horrifying surgeries to resemble Diana and will become paranoid and deeply unhappy with herself. Archie will be neglected. Neither child will be allowed out of the home unless it's to make money. Otherwise, they will be hidden away. This, in my opinion, constitutes child abuse.
However, Meghan has a significant problem on her hands. Any attention directed at the children means less attention for her. That's why she doesn't want their faces to be shown. It's creepy and dehumanizing, but that seems to be her preference.
Royalty is not the same as celebrity, a lesson Meghan learned the hard way. Besides, Charles is the king, and before that, he was the heir to the throne. People may come out to see him when he visits, but it's not as if Americans are rushing to buy luxury hampers or other merchandise online. Being a duchess has not translated into lucrative long-term entertainment deals for Meghan. She ruined those opportunities by her own actions, including her involvement in producing and acting, collaborations with prestigious brands, or even launching a subscription box with plastic tiaras, wrinkled white shirts, and silly hats. Only the most desperate royal wannabes would be interested in spending money on her fashion statements or those of her little prince and princess.
Meghan finds herself in a dilemma. She has an urge to exploit her children, but she wants them to remain faceless in the background while doing so because she cannot tolerate them receiving attention and praise that should be directed towards her. That's why they've been kept hidden to the point where people question their existence. I honestly don't see that changing, even though she desperately wants to monetize them.
However, the truth is, the kids are inherently uninteresting because no one in the United States wants royalty. The world is well aware of the Harkles' plan to use their children as money makers, but nothing substantial will come out of it. People will immediately reject this notion and recognize it for what it truly is: child abuse.
