This collective call for change has not gone unnoticed and has sparked significant transformations within the organization. The delivery of these petitions to the Invictus Games board of directors set off a chain reaction of revisions to the organization's structure, which are now prominently visible on the Invictus homepage and Wikipedia.
Notably, Prince Harry's name has completely vanished, replaced by a fresh face, Charles Allen, Baron Allen of Kensington. Baron Allen is a distinguished British entrepreneur and broadcaster, known for chairing the 2002 Commonwealth Games. His illustrious career includes involvement in the London 2012 Olympic bid team, serving as the Director of the London Organizing Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games, and even holding the prestigious position of Mayor of the Olympic Village.
Previously, Prince Harry held the role of president on the organization's website, though it's worth noting that this title often carries an honorary connotation, symbolizing a gesture of support rather than active involvement in organizational affairs. In contrast, the role of chairman entails more substantive and hands-on responsibilities.
Until recently, Harry held the esteemed position of Worthy Patron for the Invictus Games. However, recent developments have raised speculation about his commitment to the cause, with allegations suggesting a shift in his focus toward personal financial gain rather than championing the interests of veteran competitors. Concerns have been voiced that he may be more inclined to exploit the event for personal profit rather than prioritize the well-being of disabled veterans.
During the closing ceremony, significant news emerged as Vancouver was announced as the host city for the 2025 Invictus Games, a revelation made by Prince Harry himself. However, questions have been raised about Harry and Meghan's genuine commitment to indigenous rights and issues, with critics arguing that the couple has not shown authentic concern for indigenous communities and instead seems poised to capitalize on their struggles.
There has also been a notable omission of gratitude toward Canadian taxpayers, who covered their security expenses during their previous stay in Canada. Additionally, Harry and Meghan have faced criticism for what some perceive as the exploitation of veterans in their Netflix documentary.
Canadians are wary of allowing this pattern to repeat with indigenous communities and vehemently oppose supporting such endeavors. Regarding Meghan Markle's participation in the recent Invictus Games, critics have not held back their disapproval. They have cited concerns about her attire, deeming it inappropriate and out of place for the event. Reports even suggested an unpleasant odor emanating from her, further fueling criticism.
Detractors argue that Meghan's conduct during the event did not align with the expected standards, as she wore expensive and incongruous items, including flip-flops, which were perceived as inappropriate given the event's decorum.
The sentiment among Canadians is increasingly vocal. There is a growing belief that Harry and Meghan should not receive financial support for hosting the Invictus Games in Canada, given their alleged indifference to the causes they claim to support and their perceived focus on personal interests.
