Meghan Markle - a name that often evokes strong reactions around the world. Some see her as a victim, while others perceive her as a manipulative mastermind. The recent Invictus Games debacle has added fuel to this fire. It appears that the Canadians, who were once seemingly open-armed, have decided to slam the door on Meghan and Harry.
Why, you ask? Well, it seems that Meghan and Harry's track record with Canada isn't exactly pristine. They allegedly failed to express gratitude to Canadian taxpayers who funded their security during their stay in the country. Now, the Canadians have drawn a line in the sand, refusing to finance their security once again. And who can blame them? If you're using a country as a mere backdrop, shouldn't you at least show some appreciation?
But the controversy doesn't end there. Meghan seems to have had plans to use her children as a ticket back into the limelight. She intended to bring Archie and Lily to the Invictus Games, tugging at the heartstrings of the public. However, many skeptics, including our viewers, are questioning the authenticity of these claims. After all, where are these invisible children we keep hearing about?
And then there's Harry, caught in the middle of this storm. Reports suggest that he's frustrated and torn between his old life in the UK and his current existence with Meghan. It appears that his social life has taken a hit, and his desire to reconnect with the past has collided with Meghan's aspirations for the future. It's a tale of conflicting desires and ambitions.
Megan, on the other hand, seems to be playing a different game altogether. She appears focused on her individual pursuits, leaving Harry on the sidelines. Whether it's reviving her social media presence or contemplating a political career, Meghan seems ready to forge ahead solo, leaving behind the shadow of her royal connection.
And let's not forget the climate change controversy. The same couple who advocates for minimizing carbon footprints and reducing environmental impact allegedly takes private flights and indulges in a lifestyle that contradicts their own preaching. It's a classic case of "do as I say, not as I do."
