What's truly shocking is the inclusion of "Met Lilly But," a clear reference to Meghan Markle's plan, involving her daughter Lily Diana. Rumors suggest Meghan was scheming to engineer a meeting between her daughter Lily and the Queen before Her Majesty's passing. The ulterior motive?
To capture this historic encounter on camera, possibly for commercial gain and, more troublingly, potential blackmail purposes. However, it appears Her Majesty the Queen was not fooled by Meghan's intentions and had valid concerns about how professional photographers might exploit the situation. This included worries about these images being shared with U.S. networks. As a result, the Sussexes were rightfully denied this opportunity.
This isn't the first time Harry and Meghan have courted controversy. They were previously barred from bringing Netflix cameras to the Jubilee for a documentary, a stipulation agreed upon when they stepped back from their senior working roles.
Now, let's shift our focus to Omid Scobie's new book, particularly its initial chapter titled "Elizabeth." Scobie's words inadvertently shed light on the Sussexes' questionable intentions concerning the late Queen. Their lack of interest in visiting her while she was alive, despite numerous invitations, raises eyebrows and hints at their potential exploitation of their relationship with the late Queen, even in her passing.
It's been suggested that Meghan might have secretly wanted to record the Queen's final moments, potentially for use in the book and Netflix documentary or other purposes. This revelation casts a shadow over Meghan's true motives.
But the hypocrisy doesn't end there. Harry and Meghan, who advocate for climate change awareness, seem to fall short of practicing what they preach. Despite their public commitment to having only two children due to environmental concerns, they've been caught jet-setting around Europe, leaving a significant carbon footprint. Their recent travels to Germany, the UK, and Portugal have drawn sharp criticism, as they appear to be wasting fuel and energy while promoting their environmental credentials. These actions raise questions about the sincerity of their environmental advocacy and whether they truly live by their principles.
