The couple, who have frequently expressed their dedication to environmental causes, have drawn criticism for their mode of transportation This critique comes on the heels of a previous incident in which Harry and Meghan were criticized for using a fuel-guzzling seven-seater car for a short trip in New York. They had used the caravan for an event in the city that was just a block away from their hotel earlier this month.
Richard Eden, the Daily Mail's diary editor, remarked, "Last week, we were discussing a convoy of vehicles in New York, and a week later, we're discussing the two of them chartering a private jet just for a holiday. I mean, come on; the hypocrisy is breathtaking."
This turn of events is indeed surprising when one considers that Harry has previously been vocal about ethical travel and the need for people to take fewer vacations. Yet, here he was, opting for a private jet for a vacation with just the two of them and leaving their children behind.
Mr. Eden further pointed out the contrast by mentioning that other members of the royal family, such as Prince and Princess Michael of Kent, had taken low-cost flights with airlines like easyJet to destinations like the south of France, and Prince William and Catherine had flown on regular commercial flights with their family. The key issue at play here is the inconsistency between public environmental rhetoric and private actions.
Environmental activists have raised concerns about Harry and Meghan's extensive recent travel, involving more than 18,000 miles over seven flights in just 14 days. Their environmental consciousness was also called into question when they used a convoy of gas-guzzling cars to travel a mere one block to an event in New York City.
The couple has been outspoken about the importance of environmental protection and climate change, emphasizing that individual choices can make a difference. In an interview with conservationist Dr. Jane Goodall, Harry even revealed that they had decided to limit themselves to having a maximum of two children as part of their commitment to helping save the planet. This environmental stance stands in contrast to their recent travel choices.
