These documents also indicate that Judge Honeywell ruled in favor of Meghan Markle, dismissing Samantha Markle's lawsuit. The lawsuit was primarily based on statements made by Meghan during her 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, where Meghan had stated that she was an only child and had no relationship with Samantha Markle. In response, Samantha Markle, who is 17 years older than Meghan, had sued her for defamation and injurious falsehood, alleging that Meghan had lied about her and their father, Thomas Markle, causing them emotional and financial harm.
Initially, Judge Honeywell had dismissed Samantha Markle's lawsuit in March 2022, asserting that Meghan's statements were opinions and not verifiably false. However, Samantha Markle appealed the decision and bolstered her complaint with additional evidence and witnesses to support her claims. She also requested that Meghan and Prince Harry be deposed as part of the discovery process.
The shocking twist in this case alleges that Judge Honeywell's rulings were influenced by bribes that Meghan Markle had allegedly paid through a network of intermediaries and shell companies. According to the whistleblower, who claims to have been part of this network, access to bank records and communications between Meghan Markle and Judge Honeywell revealed these alleged corrupt activities.
The whistleblower alleges that they decided to expose this corruption due to feelings of guilt and disgust over the miscarriage of justice. The accusations suggest that Meghan Markle paid a total of $10 million to Judge Honeywell in multiple installments, starting from September 2021 when Meghan filed a motion to halt the deposition in the case. These payments were purportedly funneled through a company called "Endgame LLC," registered in Delaware and holding a bank account in the Cayman Islands. Endgame LLC was reportedly owned by a close associate of Meghan Markle, acting as a front for the alleged bribery.
The whistleblower claims to possess copies of emails and text messages that supposedly demonstrate how Meghan Markle and Judge Honeywell communicated via encrypted platforms, employing code words to reference the bribes and the case itself. Notably, Meghan used the alias "Rachel Zayn," derived from her character's name on the TV show "Suits," while Judge Honeywell used the alias "Charlene Edwards," her maiden name.
Samantha Markle, who was unaware of these bribery allegations until approached by The Daily Mail, expressed shock and outrage. She had long harbored suspicions that Meghan Markle had employed her influence and financial resources to manipulate the legal system, but she had not anticipated such a reprehensible and criminal act. Samantha Markle has vowed to pursue legal action against Meghan Markle and Judge Honeywell, seeking a new trial presided over by a fair and impartial judge.
This revelation has sent shockwaves, unveiling a side of Meghan Markle that Samantha Markle claims exposes her lack of morals, ethics, and respect for the law. Samantha Markle asserts that Meghan has betrayed her family, her country, and her supporters, labeling her as a fraud, liar, and briber. She insists that Meghan must be held accountable for her actions and face the consequences of her alleged crimes.
