His proposed bill would compel the House of Commons to deliberate the prospect of rebranding Harry and Meghan as plain Mr. and Mrs. Sussex. This development comes at a time when the couple is facing mounting pressure to address controversial claims made by author Omit Scoppy. Mr. Bob S has stated that his motivation for this legislation arises from the use of race to tarnish the royal family's reputation, which he considers poisonously insidious. As a member of the Commons Foreign Affairs committee, he has emphasized the harm caused by discrimination, labeling it the most insidious form of insult, as it leaves a lingering stigma and is virtually impossible to refute.
He is now applying for his "Title's Deprivation 1917 Amendment Bill" to be included on the Commons' order paper for consideration next week. The proposed bill revives wartime powers by removing references to enemies in the present context, a modification that has received approval from Parliament's table office, responsible for overseeing draft legislation.
Mr. Bob S has made it clear that he is not a Republican and supports the monarchy. However, in light of the recent tensions between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family, he believes that Parliament and the Privy Council should explore this "nuclear option." He argues that if someone no longer wishes to fulfill their royal duties, they should not retain their titles and privileges while criticizing an institution that holds significance in the nation's life.
Sources close to the Sussexes have vehemently denied their involvement in Omit Scoppy's book's claims. However, public skepticism remains high. Sally, a commentator, believes that the extraordinary action being pursued was warranted due to the gravity of the accusations made in the book. She suggests that this move has been in the works for some time, with Bob S waiting for the opportune moment to introduce it.
Critics have argued that the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall lack an understanding of the constitutional role of the monarchy and have capitalized on their positions for personal gain. They contend that such privileges should not be retained if the individuals in question opt for a lifetime of minimal public service, particularly during a time of economic hardship and costly conflicts.
The discussion around Meghan's title, if she were to divorce Prince Harry, has also surfaced. While she is married to Harry, she is entitled to be referred to as Princess Henry. However, if they were to separate, the princess title would likely be relinquished. By having Parliament advocate for their title removal, it could alleviate pressure on the King to take such action, thereby reflecting the public sentiment.
In principle, this move is seen as a positive development, as politicians typically steer clear of royal controversies. However, the explosive nature of the discrimination claims has prompted unusual levels of condemnation, even from figures like Tom Chenut, the security minister, who has defended the dignity of the King and the Princess of Wales while dismissing the claims as mere rumors and gossip.
