Alun Holmes, always the pragmatist, suggested that the bill wasn't excessively high, while Isabel Webster pointed out that things seemed to be going quite well for Prince William and Princess Kate, particularly when compared to the challenges faced by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. According to Kinsey Scoffield, it appears that Prince Harry is in 'fight or flight' mode, with a focus on legal battles rather than charitable endeavors.
She commented on the ongoing court situation, stating that Harry's attorney argues that the article in question is an attack on Prince Harry's honesty and integrity, undermining his charity work and efforts against online misinformation. The irony, as Scoffield pointed out, lies in the fact that over the past year, the Sussexes' commitment to honesty and integrity seems to have been lacking. She highlighted a series of falsehoods, including those presented in Omid Scobie's book 'Endgame.'
Notably, the book contained inaccuracies and embarrassing errors that raised eyebrows, with only a modest number of copies sold. Last year's Netflix documentary also faced criticism, with royal experts debunking several claims as fiction. The accusations that Meghan had received no help learning the ropes were labeled as a total lie. Additionally, Scobie's book, deemed a mouthpiece for the Sussexes, faced backlash for factual errors, including wrongly naming royal titles and calling Princess Kate lazy.
Despite the controversies surrounding the Sussexes, Scoffield questioned their significance, especially since 'Endgame' sold only a modest number of copies. The controversy deepened when the names of alleged royal racists were mistakenly published in the Dutch version of the book, leading to swift removal from shelves.
As if legal battles weren't enough, Prince Harry also faced accusations of not understanding how major British laws work. The question that remains is whether this is just a storm in a teacup or a tumultuous chapter in the Sussexes' royal saga.
