Meghan and Harry insist they obtained explicit permission from the Queen to use the name Lilibet. They perceive the ongoing allegations as part of an ongoing smear campaign against them. However, their response lacks concrete proof of the late Queen's approval. Scooby, known for making controversial claims, is now expressing concern for Queen Elizabeth's legacy. Reports suggest that Queen Elizabeth once stated, "I don't own the palaces or the paintings, only my name." A new book by Robert Hardman, titled "Charles III: New King, New Court – The Inside Story," alleges that the Queen was notably upset when Meghan and Harry utilized her private nickname.
Royal Insider Angela Levan, speaking to GB News, expressed sadness at the situation, citing the Queen's emotional connection to the name Lilibet. Levan explained that Megan had officially secured the names even before Lilibet's birth, intending to use them for commercial purposes. The host, Alan Holmes, expressed shock at the revelation.
Levan elaborated on the Queen's sentiment, emphasizing that Lilibet was a unique and intimate name within the royal family, used by her family members out of love. Levan criticized Meghan's actions as disrespectful, viewing it as a calculated move driven by resentment for not receiving what she desired within the royal family.
Levan condemned Meghan's decision to register the domain lilibetdiana.com for merchandising even before the birth, characterizing it as a twisted intention to cause pain and maximize profits. She expressed concern about Meghan's future plans for Lilibet and speculated that the move was a result of Meghan's perceived grievances within the royal family.
The report concludes by highlighting Meghan's opportunistic approach to naming her daughter, referencing a moment at Philip's funeral when the Queen placed a letter with the name Lilibet on his coffin. Despite the world finding it a sweet gesture, Meghan's decision to merchandise the name raises questions about her motivations and plans for the future.
