Bond, in an interview with Fabulous magazine, commended Princess Mary for making a genuine effort to adapt to Danish culture and the royal hierarchy after moving from Australia to Denmark. In contrast, Meghan publicly complained about having to learn the national anthem in English. Bond emphasized that Mary, a successful career woman before marriage, understood her role in the royal family and embraced the challenges with grace.
According to Bond, the key difference lies in personality and maturity. While Princess Mary adapted to a different culture, Meghan struggled with the demands of royal life. Bond believes Meghan's inability to grasp her place in the royal family and accept the hierarchy contributed to her challenges. Unlike Mary, Meghan seemed unprepared for the realities of being in a position where she would always play second fiddle to William and Catherine.
The comparison underscores Meghan's public complaints about the difficulties she faced, contrasting with Mary's silent dedication to learning a new language and embracing her royal responsibilities. Critics argue that Meghan, despite portraying herself as selfless, was, in fact, a Hollywood grifter from the beginning. The British royal family, they contend, was merely a refueling stop for her, not a genuine destination. Meghan's early focus on potential perks, like visiting Commonwealth countries for free holidays, further fueled skepticism about her commitment to the rigorous demands of royal life.
