However, skepticism has arisen regarding the legitimacy and credibility of the award, presented by The Living Legends of Aviation—a group of 100 individuals recognized for their substantial contributions to aviation and aerospace. Some critics contend that the group operates as a pay-to-play scheme, allowing individuals to gain entry by making donations or sponsoring events. Others have pointed out the irony of honoring Prince Harry, who has faced criticism for his frequent use of private jets and helicopters, despite professing environmentalism and sustainable travel.
During an interview at the aviation awards ceremony, Morgan Freeman expressed doubt about the authenticity of Prince Harry's pilot license. The most significant criticism, however, has emanated from military veterans and experienced aviators, who view Prince Harry's aviation background as inflated and inconsequential. They accuse him of leveraging his royal status to advance his career and gain recognition, challenging his claims of being a humanitarian, particularly citing his involvement in controversial combat missions in Afghanistan.
Retired Army Colonel Richard Kemp, who served in Afghanistan and Iraq, stated that Prince Harry's role as a gunner did not qualify him as a pilot, dismissing the notion of him as a legend of aviation as "ridiculous" and an insult to accomplished pilots. Another anonymous former military pilot argued that Prince Harry received preferential treatment and was fast-tracked through training due to his royal status, emphasizing his lack of experience in hostile environments.
Some critics suggest that Meghan Markle orchestrated the award as part of a PR strategy to boost the couple's image in the US. Accusing her of ambition and manipulation, they speculate that the award is a calculated move to align themselves with the Hollywood elite. A source close to the couple claimed that Meghan is the driving force, seeking to make Harry a star in America and rewrite history. They describe Harry as a puppet, following Meghan's directives, with no genuine expertise in aviation or other matters.
