During Eugenie's wedding, when she first claimed to be pregnant, she chose not to use the Queen's doctors. Now, why would she do that if everything was as straightforward as she claims? It's as if she has something to hide. Let's address the elephant in the room – suspicions surrounding the legitimacy of Meghan's pregnancy. The royal family couldn't exactly lift the dress and have a look, and they were wary of upsetting the hurdles in any way, so they had to go along with it.
Did Meghan even inform the palace of the doctor she was consulting? Many signs point to a fast one being pulled. Here's where it gets even more bizarre – the royal family, potentially coerced or manipulated by Meghan, might have recommended announcing a miscarriage to cover the fact that she used a surrogate. Knowing Meghan's thirst for the limelight, she probably refused this option because she had more plans for her future.
The lies, as they say, have been exposed – from questionable fake baby bumps to discrepancies in birth certificates and mysterious stories, the list goes on. Of course, a cover-up ensued. The Harkovs made the pregnancy announcement at Eugenie's wedding, then jetted off to Australia, spending part of Meghan's pregnancy outside London. Harry didn't even announce when the child was born, handing over the documents.
If the surrogate rumors are true, even crisis management experts would be left scratching their heads. Pulling off a stunt like this seems impossible, and the potential fallout would be unprecedented if true. This revelation would go down as the biggest hoax in royal history. And if that's not enough drama for one day, royal commentators claim that King Charles subtly addressed Prince Harry and Meghan in the Christmas address, urging them to do unto others as you would do unto yourself.
