Lady C Accuses Prince Harry of Perjury, Exposing Alleged Fabrication of NYPD Letter in British Court

In a recent development, Lady C has accused Prince Harry of perjury, alleging that he and Meghan Markle faked an NYPD letter that was presented as evidence in a British court. The letter in question was sent to the UK High Court as part of a client security case, supposedly sent by the NYPD in September. Public opinion and insider sources have voiced their belief that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry indeed fabricated the NYPD letter, which was subsequently submitted to the UK court. The letter claimed that arrests could be made in connection with a dangerous paparazzi chase involving the couple in Manhattan last year. However, sources close to the situation have informed The New York Post that there is insufficient evidence to pursue any charges.

As part of its decision to deny Prince Harry state-funded security, the British court cited a formal letter from the NYPD to London's Metropolitan Police. The letter alleged that the paparazzi had engaged in reckless and persistently dangerous behavior while pursuing the Sussexes through Manhattan in May. However, NYPD sources have informed The New York Post that the case was thoroughly investigated by both the NYPD and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, and no charges are likely to be filed.

While the investigation did uncover reckless and unacceptable behavior by the paparazzi, it also found that Harry and Meghan's own actions contributed to the circumstances by not adhering to a proposed stop by the NYPD. Sources state that Harry has been insistent on someone being arrested, but such a step would require evidence that is currently unavailable. Another source referenced how the NYPD and the royals had discussed a planned destination during the incident, where the police could control traffic flow.

The official letter, sent in September by the NYPD to London's Metropolitan Police, was part of the London High Court's consideration of Prince Harry's lawsuit against the British government. The lawsuit demanded tax-funded police protection in the UK, similar to what he had when he was a member of the royal family before stepping down in 2020.

The inclusion of the letter, produced by Harry's own lawyer, in the court filing seemed to provide a momentary sense of vindication for the royals. However, this vindication has proven short-lived, as doubts and irregularities surrounding the letter have emerged. The Washington Post has also reported that there is insufficient evidence to pursue anyone involved in the alleged car chase in New York.

Lady C, in her accusation of perjury against Prince Harry, highlighted the potential criminal offense of presenting a letter that was not original but rather a forgery. She expressed doubts about the authenticity of the letter due to numerous irregularities. Lady C suggested that unless a dedicated member of the public demands a private prosecution, it is unlikely that any legal repercussions will befall Harry, given his privileged position.

In an online poll conducted by POV, with 3,500 participants, a staggering 99% believed that Harry and Meghan faked the NYPD letter submitted to the court. Various comments expressed skepticism and frustration, questioning why the NP (NYPD) was not pursuing them for perjury and suggesting that the couple showed disrespect for America.

The original story had indicated that it was Harry's own security team who drove recklessly, not the paparazzi who were on bikes. The entire situation has raised suspicions and left a lingering air of controversy around the incident.