Royal expert questions whether Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s millionaire lifestyle holds public appeal
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s journey since stepping back from royal duties in 2020 has kept them in the global spotlight. From their Montecito mansion to high-profile media ventures, the couple’s millionaire lifestyle is undeniably glamorous. But a royal commentator recently stirred debate, suggesting that Meghan’s luxurious life might not fascinate the public as much as it once did. So, is the world still captivated by the Duchess of Sussex, or has interest waned?
Meghan Markle, once a Hollywood actress and now a philanthropist and producer, has built a brand centered on empowerment and creativity. Alongside Prince Harry, she’s launched initiatives like the Archewell Foundation and secured deals with Netflix and Spotify. Their California home, valued at over $14 million, symbolizes their independence from the royal family. Yet, royal expert Jane Smith (name changed for this piece) argues that this opulent lifestyle may feel disconnected from everyday struggles.
“Meghan’s story was compelling when it was about breaking barriers in the royal family,” Smith told a British outlet. “But now, her focus on wealth and celebrity circles doesn’t resonate with people facing economic challenges.” With global inflation and cost-of-living concerns dominating headlines in 2025, some wonder if Meghan’s curated image aligns with public priorities.
The critique isn’t new. Meghan and Harry’s decision to leave the royal family sparked polarized reactions. Supporters admire their boldness in forging a new path, praising Meghan’s advocacy for mental health and racial equality. Critics, however, see their media projects—like Harry’s memoir Spare and their Netflix docuseries—as cashing in on royal ties while distancing themselves from duty.
Smith’s comments reflect a broader sentiment among some royal watchers: Meghan’s millionaire lifestyle, complete with A-list friendships and luxury retreats, feels unrelatable. “The public loved her as a working royal,” Smith noted. “Now, it’s harder to see what makes her story unique compared to other celebrities.”
Not everyone agrees. Fans argue Meghan remains a cultural force, blending glamour with purpose. Her recent speeches on women’s rights and online safety have drawn praise, while Archewell’s charitable work quietly impacts communities. Google Trends data from early 2025 shows “Meghan Markle” consistently ranking among top-searched royals, trailing only Kate Middleton. Posts on X reveal a split: some call her “irrelevant,” while others defend her as a trailblazer.
Prince Harry’s role also shapes perceptions. His Invictus Games and mental health advocacy keep the couple relevant, countering claims of fading interest. “Harry and Meghan represent a modern monarchy, whether the establishment likes it or not,” one X user posted last month. Their ability to pivot—focusing on philanthropy over palace drama—suggests they’re adapting to shifting public tastes.
The debate over Meghan’s appeal underscores a larger truth: public interest is fickle. The royal family itself faces scrutiny, with King Charles navigating health challenges and Prince William preparing for his future role. Meghan and Harry, free from royal constraints, can redefine their narrative. Upcoming projects, like their rumored Netflix series on veterans, could reconnect with audiences seeking authenticity.
For now, Meghan Markle’s lifestyle remains a lightning rod—celebrated by some, questioned by others. Whether she’s captivating or not depends on who’s watching. As one fan tweeted, “Meghan doesn’t need to please everyone. She’s living her truth.” In a world craving relatability, that might just be enough.
