Type Here to Get Search Results !

Royal Protection Officer Slams Prince Harry's Upcoming Trip to Nigeria: Is it Proof for Home Office?

Royal Protection Officer Slams Prince Harry's Upcoming Trip to Nigeria: Is it Proof for Home Office?

Prince Harry has been criticized by a Royal Protection Officer for his upcoming trip to Nigeria, raising questions and concerns among security experts. While Harry reportedly aims to promote the Invictus Games in Nigeria, and Meghan Markle may relish the chance to connect with her self-declared 43% Nigerian ancestry, security experts are questioning the decision.

The couple's planned visit to Nigeria this month comes despite the US State Department issuing a level three advisory for the African nation, the second-highest risk level. Concerns about crime, terrorism, civil unrest, kidnapping, and armed gangs have led the State Department to strongly advise against travel to Nigeria. Additionally, Nigeria's military has been engaged in a deadly war against Islamic extremists in the country's Northeast since 2009.

Harry's apparent disregard for personal security, especially given his deep concerns about security in the UK, has raised eyebrows. The California-based Duke of Sussex has previously sued the UK government, headed by his father, King Charles III, over his belief that his American wife and two children can't be safe while visiting his home country unless they have access to taxpayer-funded protection.

Former Royal Protection Officer, D Davies, expressed surprise at Harry's decision to visit one of the world's most dangerous countries, considering the risk factors. Davies questioned the rationale behind the visit, given Nigeria's dangerous reputation and the security concerns raised by the Global Peace Index.

Furthermore, Davies highlighted Harry's previous comments about his time in Afghanistan, where he claimed to have killed 25 people, raising additional security concerns. Davies emphasized the religious demographics of Nigeria, where just over half of the population is Muslim, which could potentially pose a security risk given Harry's past remarks.

The trip to Nigeria is seen as evidence in favor of the British Home Ministry's arguments regarding security concerns. Meghan's assertion of her Nigerian ancestry has also drawn criticism, with questions raised about the cost of the visit and the couple's motives.

Critics argue that the visit will achieve little beyond serving the couple's own interests and advancing their "royal fantasy." Questions have also been raised about whether Meghan will have any meaningful interaction with ordinary people during the visit.

The planned trip to Nigeria has sparked controversy and raised questions about the couple's priorities and security considerations. Critics suggest that the visit may be little more than a publicity stunt, with doubts about its potential benefits and the couple's true motives.

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.