Earlier this year, a group of bloggers and eagle-eyed fans noticed anomalies and inconsistencies in photos of Meghan supposedly pregnant with Archie and Lilibet. Issues such as the absence of a visible bump under certain outfits, proportions not adding up, and no noticeable movements or kicks led to speculation about the use of moon bump prosthetics—padding designed to create the illusion of pregnancy without an actual baby.
This theory suggested that Meghan might not have carried the babies herself, aiming to avoid complications that could affect her public duties and image. While some dismissed these claims as far-fetched, questions remained unanswered until now.
Dr. Richards has reviewed the evidence in detail and has grave doubts about Meghan’s alleged pregnancies. She points to new footage from Meghan and Harry’s Netflix documentary, where Meghan is seen emerging from a vehicle in a tight green dress. According to Dr. Richards, Meghan’s midsection appears completely flat, which she argues is inconsistent with a woman who gave birth to Lilibet just seven months earlier.
Dr. Richards explains that medically, it would be impossible for a postpartum woman to regain a flat stomach so quickly without significant intervention. The uterus takes much longer to shrink fully, and toned muscles do not return so rapidly postpartum without surgical procedures. She also notes that Meghan walks in a way that seems completely uninhibited, without the waddling gait typically seen in women carrying a full-term baby. Additionally, in various shots where Harry embraces Meghan from behind, there are no visible lines or irregularities from prosthetics, which would be expected if they were used.
Dr. Richards believes that, based on her professional analysis, Meghan would have needed surrogates for both pregnancies and may have used Hollywood-level moon bump trickery to maintain appearances. Her credentials lend unusual weight to these claims.
While this may sound unfathomable to some, considering the lengths Hollywood and high-profile individuals go to protect their narratives, it’s not entirely out of the question. With millions at stake and Meghan in the spotlight as the first American mixed-race royal bride, her pregnancies were crucial to redeeming her public image after various scandals. Being pregnant also provided convenient cover for avoiding public duties and justified their departure from the royal family.
Experts speculate that using surrogates could have given Meghan more control over optics and reduced career risks. Some fans have noted inconsistencies in her bump appearance and her refusal to publicly discuss birth experiences or share standard photos, which has fueled ongoing skepticism.
If true, the implications could be enormous. Deliberate deception on such a scale would undermine the Sussexes' message of authenticity and trust. It might also explain persistent rumors of deep rifts with the palace, who could have feared being unwitting accomplices if the truth ever emerged. Most concerningly, it could impact Archie and Lilibet, who might remain unaware of the truth about their origins.
The Sussexes have yet to comment on Dr. Richards' analysis to major outlets. However, the obstetrician’s expertise and the compelling evidence from the documentary footage are difficult to ignore. This development is certainly shaking up opinions on this controversial theory.
