You may recall Meghan Markle's emotional interviews and heartfelt articles about her personal struggles, but now, with the release of Meghan's PR piece in *Hello!* magazine, we're faced with some puzzling inconsistencies that only add to the growing list of her seemingly unbelievable claims. Among these, we find a particularly odd story about a supposed miscarriage, which occurred under such unusual circumstances that one might think it was pulled from a daytime soap opera.
According to Meghan's friend, Abigail Spencer, the miscarriage happened on the day Meghan and Prince Harry moved into their lavish Montecito mansion. Spencer recounts a dramatic scene where Meghan, in pain and holding Archie, collapsed in the driveway—a traumatic moment, no doubt. However, Meghan’s version in *The New York Times* tells a different tale. In that account, she describes how she was inside, cradling Archie when the miscarriage occurred. It was the morning after their big move, and she was reportedly going about household tasks.
The conflicting versions raise some serious questions. Did it happen indoors or outdoors? Was Meghan running errands or cuddling with Archie? The contradictions are so stark that one can't help but wonder—how much of this story is even true?
In the Netflix documentary, Spencer is visibly emotional as she recounts her role in this tragic event. She explains how she wasn’t allowed to speak about Meghan’s situation and felt helpless in assisting her friend. Yet, Spencer was apparently the first person Meghan called during this critical moment, despite being on the verge of collapsing. That's some intense friendship—always ready for a dramatic scene, driveway collapse and all.
Then there's Meghan’s evocative description of the miscarriage. She speaks of humming a lullaby to calm herself and Archie during the ordeal. First of all, is humming lullabies a typical response during a medical emergency? And let’s not forget—Meghan claimed to have fallen indoors, while Spencer stated it happened outside. That’s a pretty significant difference—one that most people would remember.
And the details get stranger. Meghan mentions stumbling upon a crayon left behind by the movers for Archie to use. News flash: babies don’t typically use crayons. Plus, who finds a rogue crayon the morning after moving into a mansion with 16 bathrooms? It feels like just another unnecessary detail to add drama.
Adding to the complexity, Meghan recently claimed the miscarriage was caused by the stress of her ongoing lawsuit against *The Daily Mail*. If that doesn’t sound convenient, what does? Let’s not forget that she initiated the lawsuit herself. With all the nannies, chefs, and cleaners at her disposal, she wants us to believe that the stress of a court case—something she willingly pursued—was enough to cause a miscarriage.
The cherry on top of this convoluted story? Harry claims he buried the remains of their lost baby under a banyan tree—with his bare hands. Now, Meghan said she was only a few weeks along, so what exactly did Harry put under that tree? For someone who has been caught in several lies, this entire story feels like an over-the-top episode of a low-budget reality show.
To be clear, miscarriages are heartbreaking and deserve compassion and empathy. But when the stories surrounding them are riddled with inconsistencies, it becomes difficult to believe any of it. Meghan and Harry seem intent on living out their personal drama on a public stage, no matter how contrived it appears.
This story, like many of Meghan's tales, is full of holes. That's why solving the "surrogate gate" mystery is becoming more urgent by the day.
