The question of whether using a surname like "Meghan Sussex" feels too formal has been a topic of discussion among royal watchers and the public alike. As Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, continues to navigate her life both within and outside of the royal family, how she chooses to identify herself remains an interesting subject.
Historically, royals don’t always use traditional surnames in the same way the rest of the world does. For instance, Prince William and Prince Harry have often used “Wales” as their surname in professional and military settings, reflecting their father’s title, the Prince of Wales. Similarly, Meghan adopting “Sussex” could be seen as a modern extension of this practice.
But does it come across as overly formal?
In the context of everyday life, using titles like "Duchess of Sussex" or "Prince of Wales" might seem ceremonial, fitting for official events and royal duties. However, in more casual or public settings, opting for a name like "Meghan Sussex" could strike a balance between royal tradition and modern informality. It allows her to maintain a connection to her title while stepping slightly away from the rigidity of her full royal designation.
For some, this approach might still feel formal. The title "Sussex" is, after all, tied to royal heritage and can carry an air of grandeur. On the other hand, using a surname like "Sussex" may also help differentiate her public persona from her former acting career, where she was simply known as Meghan Markle. In this sense, “Meghan Sussex” creates a bridge between her past and present, offering her a way to navigate both worlds.
Ultimately, the formality of the name comes down to perception. For some, the use of “Sussex” will always be linked to the nobility, while others may see it as a practical, modern-day adaptation of royal tradition.
What do you think? Does "Meghan Sussex" strike the right balance, or does it feel too formal in today’s world?
