Type Here to Get Search Results !

King Charles Strips Titles from Meghan Markle's Children Following Surrogacy Revelation

King Charles Strips Titles from Meghan Markle's Children Following Surrogacy Revelation

Regarding Meghan Markle and some scandalous new documents that have been sent directly to King Charles about her children. As you may know, there has been immense speculation surrounding whether Meghan used a surrogate to carry her two children with Prince Harry. Let me provide you with some background.

For years, keen royal watchers have noticed unusual inconsistencies regarding Meghan's pregnancies. With Archie, she seemed to have a small baby bump that disappeared remarkably quickly after birth. Many speculated that she did not appear to be in her third trimester. Then, with Lilibet, Meghan claimed to have had a miscarriage earlier in the year before announcing her pregnancy, leading to further curious timing. Photos surfaced of her wearing extremely tight clothing that didn’t seem compatible with a pregnancy. Some observers even suggested she appeared to be wearing a prosthetic bump. 

All of this remained speculation until now. Lady Colin Campbell, a renowned royal biographer known for her critically acclaimed books about the royal family, has obtained highly sensitive documents that allegedly prove surrogacy was used. Lady C has deep insider connections and revealed to me that an individual with close ties to Meghan's California-based doctor secretly photocopied confidential medical records, invoices, and contracts related to her two pregnancy journeys.

This anonymous source was reportedly appalled by what they viewed as Meghan’s deception to the public and felt compelled to expose the truth by leaking these documents to Lady C. Upon reviewing the paperwork, Lady C stated there is irrefutable proof that Meghan engaged the services of an American surrogate agency based in California to have Archie and Lilibet through egg retrieval and implantation. The documents reportedly include invoices for egg extraction from Meghan, fertilization, and implantation of selected embryos into the surrogate, along with medical care provided throughout both surrogate pregnancies and deliveries.

According to Lady C's source, Meghan's eggs were harvested and fertilized with Harry's sperm in early 2018. The first viable embryo was then implanted into their selected surrogate, who carried Archie to term. All medical care, legal fees, and compensation for the surrogate were thoroughly documented. Lady C also confirmed that Meghan's second egg retrieval and implantation into a new surrogate occurred in late 2020, resulting in Lilibet's birth in June 2021. Both surrogates were compensated and had signed strict non-disclosure agreements. Furthermore, evidence indicates that the surrogate agency is owned by one of Meghan's close friends from university, who profited significantly from these secret surrogacy arrangements.

Now you can understand Lady C's urgency to reveal the truth. She believes the public has been misled and that the palace has been deceived into believing Meghan carried her own children. This raises serious questions about Meghan's motivations, character, and honesty. Did she fabricate her pregnancies for public sympathy, knowing she could not carry a child due to her age? Did she use surrogates from the outset but cover it up with prosthetic bump photo shoots? 

Now that the leaked medical evidence has been handed over to King Charles at his Scottish residence, we can anticipate a serious review and response from the palace regarding these documents. The revelations in this medical dossier could have significant ramifications for Meghan and Harry's future ties to the monarchy. However, the palace has remained silent thus far concerning the surrogacy claims. Some experts suggest this silence indicates that they are currently verifying the authenticity of the documentation. 

Once proven genuine, it could dismantle the carefully crafted image Meghan has built as a devoted wife and mother. She may face the loss of her royal title and patronages for misleading the public on such a large scale. At the very least, this scandal challenges her portrayal as a victim.


Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.