Where’s Meghan? Why is Prince Harry out there on his own? I’ve got some reports on this, and I know you’ve looked into it as well. What are your thoughts on the fact that Meghan isn’t showing up for Harry's events?
A couple of things come to mind. First, this whole "Where’s Meghan?" reminds me of the "Where’s Kate?" or "Where’s Princess Katherine?" trend from earlier this year. It seems like they’re trying to piggyback off that, to make "Where’s Meghan?" go viral. But honestly, who really cares where Meghan is?
The second thing that stands out is how Meghan seems to be inserting herself into Harry’s solo endeavors, even if she’s not physically present. It's like she can’t let him have his moment – she still has to be part of the conversation. And it’s not surprising that this article is from *The Telegraph*, a publication known for being very pro-Harry and Meghan.
Meghan is still making headlines even though she’s not attending any of Harry’s events. It’s his seventh solo engagement, and yet the media keeps bringing up Meghan. It feels like she needs to remind everyone, “I’m still here,” even though she’s not there in person. It’s bizarre.
And speaking of bizarre, *People* magazine (clearly one of Harry and Meghan’s go-to outlets) ran a piece called *Inside Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s New Dynamic: A Twin-Track Approach*. This was supposed to be Harry’s time to shine, focusing on his charitable endeavors. But now, all of a sudden, it’s a "twin-track approach" where Meghan is supposedly helping in her own way.
She just can’t help herself from making it about her, can she?
There have been rumors that Harry’s solo appearances are part of a strategy. The idea is that by going out on his own, Harry can remind the public why they liked him in the first place. If his popularity goes up, the theory is that it will reflect positively on Meghan, and people will start accepting her again.
But it seems like even when Harry is out there alone, Meghan’s influence is always lurking in the background, especially in the media.
Even when Harry is trying to focus on his work, Meghan somehow becomes part of the story. Like in this *People* article, they talk about how Harry is out there making a difference in Africa, championing causes like the HIV crisis. And then they quickly shift to Meghan, who’s back in Montecito, supposedly preparing for the launch of her new Netflix show and lifestyle brand, *American Riviera Orchard*. It’s as if her work is equally important as Harry’s charity efforts, which feels completely off.
It’s pretty frustrating. Meghan’s projects have nothing to do with charity. As far as we know, *American Riviera Orchard* is a commercial venture under her company, Archwell Productions. Plus, the U.S. Trademark Office already rejected her attempt to trademark the name, so she’s going to have to rename it anyway.
But while Harry is out doing genuine charitable work, Meghan is focused on making money, despite her claims of being all about charity. It’s such a contradiction.
Exactly. And the spin they’re trying to put on this is that Harry and Meghan have found a "new dynamic" – with Harry focusing on philanthropy and Meghan leaning into her entrepreneurial ventures. It’s clear to me that they’re trying to present this as a balanced, joint effort. But in reality, it feels like everything Harry is doing is being used to promote Meghan’s upcoming projects.
It’s messy, and it doesn’t make them look trustworthy at all. It’s almost like Harry’s charity work is just a front to push Meghan’s business ventures.
And it’s sad to see how they’ve muddled what could have been a clear charitable focus. Instead, it’s all about mixing charity with commercial gain, which is a bad look for both of them.
