Meghan Markle, once the face behind the now-defunct lifestyle blog *The Tig*, has long faced accusations of plagiarism. Critics claim she borrowed ideas and words from countless magazines and writers to curate her content. The Tig, some say, was less an original creation and more a patchwork quilt of recycled advice and trends.
It’s not surprising to see these allegations resurface—many noticed similarities between *The Tig* and iconic media like *Sex and the City*. Some argue Meghan channeled her inner Carrie Bradshaw, the fictional columnist and original influencer, and presented a version of herself as a modern-day lifestyle guru.
But is this just another chapter in what critics call Meghan’s lifelong habit of imitation? For years, people have pointed out her apparent penchant for mimicking the styles and personas of others, from Julia Roberts’ charm to the late Princess Diana’s elegance. This recurring theme has led detractors to joke that her children could have been aptly named "Prince Plagiarist" and "Princess Cosplayer."
Then there’s the controversy surrounding the names Archie and Lilibet, which some claim were borrowed from royal family nicknames. If true, it’s another example of Meghan allegedly taking inspiration—perhaps too literally—from others.
Even her personal branding choices spark debate. Reports suggest she once wore Princess Diana’s signature perfume to capture Prince Harry’s attention. While some see this as a sentimental tribute, others view it as another calculated move in her so-called "copy-paste" lifestyle.
This critique extends beyond fashion and fragrance. Meghan has been accused of recycling ideas for books, speeches, and even recipes. To her critics, she’s a “human copy machine,” a figure whose originality seems perpetually in question. They point to her infamous tongue-licking gesture as a curious quirk that might have its roots in her pre-royal past—or, as some snarkily suggest, an attempt to start an unusual trend.
However, imitation isn’t unheard of in the worlds of fashion and media. Many influencers draw inspiration from others. The real debate lies in where inspiration ends and outright copying begins. For Meghan, the line seems blurry to her detractors, who claim The Tig was less about sharing authentic insights and more about attracting attention.
Perhaps the harshest criticism came when Meghan reportedly referred to herself as “a fraud.” While some view this as a moment of vulnerability, others see it as an unintentional admission. Her decision to shut down *The Tig* has been interpreted as an effort to dodge potential legal issues tied to her alleged borrowing of ideas.
Still, Meghan’s defenders argue she’s unfairly scrutinized in ways that others in her position aren’t. In an industry where originality is often subjective, is she being judged more harshly simply because of who she is?
Ultimately, the Meghan Markle debate boils down to perception. Is she a savvy curator of trends and ideas, or a perpetual imitator unable to find her own voice? The truth, as always, may lie somewhere in between.
