The mystery and revelations that Meghan Markle has stirred up—it’s worse than we ever could have imagined.
Isn’t it peculiar how rarely we see Archie and Lilibet? Compare this to Prince William and Princess Catherine’s children: Charlotte’s charming waves, Louis’s cheeky antics, and George’s growing sense of duty. These moments feel authentic and real—children being themselves. But with the Sussex children, all we get are highly curated and strategic glimpses, raising more questions than answers.
Now, this latest controversy regarding Lilibet’s appearance has added more fuel to the fire. Claims are surfacing about how she supposedly resembles Princess Eugenie, a connection Meghan seems eager to emphasize. But are we being sold a crafted narrative?
Think back to Meghan’s pregnancy with Archie. The shifting baby bump and odd movements caught on camera sparked plenty of skepticism. Then came Lilibet, announced during that infamous Oprah interview where the Sussexes aired grievances about the royal family. The timing of these announcements often seems… too convenient.
Compare this with Catherine, who openly faced severe morning sickness during her pregnancies. She was honest about her struggles and was sometimes visibly unwell at public events—proof of the realities of pregnancy. Meghan, on the other hand, was seen jetting around the world and looking flawless in stilettos.
The idea of Lilibet resembling Eugenie feels calculated, doesn’t it? Eugenie, one of the few royals still publicly associated with the Sussexes, is being drawn into this carefully crafted story. It’s yet another way Meghan seems to maintain some royal connection, despite their ongoing estrangement.
King Charles has shown immense dignity throughout these ongoing controversies. As a loving grandfather, he extends olive branches to Harry and his children. Yet, Meghan appears to leverage this love, using it as emotional manipulation.
Remember the Sussexes’ infamous Christmas card, showing only their children’s backs? That wasn’t about privacy—it was about creating intrigue and maintaining control over the narrative. It’s a tactic they’ve used time and again.
It’s hard not to notice a pattern: Whenever William and Catherine achieve something significant, there’s suddenly a new photo or story about Archie or Lilibet. From Catherine’s groundbreaking early childhood initiatives to William’s Earthshot Prize, the Sussexes always seem to time their announcements to steal the spotlight.
This strategic timing has become glaringly obvious, and many are starting to see through the act.
The royal family continues to handle these controversies with grace, but the constant attention-seeking from the Sussexes creates an unnecessary circus. While the real working royals carry out their duties with dignity, Harry and Meghan’s moves often seem like desperate grabs for relevance.
It’s heartbreaking, particularly for Harry. Once a beloved prince carrying his mother’s legacy, he now seems caught in a web of manufactured narratives, allowing his children to be used as tools for publicity.
The saddest part of this saga is its impact on the children. Whether they are being shielded or exploited, they are being denied their rightful place in history. If Archie and Lilibet exist as claimed, they are missing out on relationships with their cousins and the chance to grow up as part of their royal heritage.
I genuinely hope I’m wrong about some of this. I want to believe that Archie and Lilibet are real, happy, and loved. But the lack of evidence and the calculated narratives make it hard to ignore the questions.
The British public is beginning to see through these manipulations. The contrast between the two royal families has never been clearer: William and Catherine raising their children with grace and responsibility, and Harry and Meghan caught in an endless cycle of media games.
Let’s hope for brighter days ahead—for everyone involved.
