The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, are once again in the spotlight—but this time, it’s not just tabloids or royal watchers calling them out. The IRS might be taking a closer look at their charity, Archewell Foundation, and questions are being raised about where the millions in donations are actually going. What started as a noble endeavor to support charitable causes now appears to be mired in controversy, with accusations of financial mismanagement and lack of transparency.
The latest bombshell comes from a user on X (formerly Twitter), who pointed out that Archewell received a staggering $13 million from USAID—the U.S. government agency responsible for funding international development projects. While the funds were presumably intended to support global initiatives, critics are now questioning whether the money was used as intended or if it ended up funding Harry and Meghan’s lavish lifestyle.
The numbers tell a troubling story. Out of the $13 million, Archewell reportedly donated only $650,000 to actual charities. Even more eyebrow-raising is the fact that $250,000 of that amount went to the Travyon Martin Foundation, run by Ashley B., a close associate of the Sussexes. This leaves a whopping $12.35 million unaccounted for, with critics speculating that a significant portion was funneled into administrative costs, including salaries, luxury travel, security, and other personal expenses.
One of the biggest red flags surrounding Archewell is its registration in Delaware, a state known for its lax financial regulations and reputation as a haven for shady financial dealings. The charity’s funds reportedly move through a complex maze of donor-advised accounts and anonymous contributions, making it nearly impossible to trace where the money ultimately ends up. By the time anyone tries to follow the trail, the funds seem to vanish into thin air.
This lack of transparency has raised serious concerns about Archewell’s operations. Critics argue that the foundation is less of a charity and more of a cleverly disguised PR operation, allowing Harry and Meghan to maintain their image as philanthropists while funneling donations into their own coffers. The 5% minimum donation rule for charities? Archewell is barely meeting that threshold, with the bulk of the funds seemingly used to cover overhead costs.
The scrutiny doesn’t stop at Archewell. Harry’s role as Chief Impact Officer at BetterUp, a mental health startup, has also come under fire. The company reportedly secured a lucrative contract with the U.S. Department of Defense, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest and whether Harry’s royal status played a role in securing the deal. If a certain former president returns to office, this arrangement could face even greater scrutiny, potentially cutting off another source of income for the Sussexes.
Adding to the controversy is the Aspen Institute, another organization linked to Harry and Meghan, which also received USAID funding. Critics argue that this is further evidence of the Sussexes’ globalist networking efforts, using their connections to secure funds for their pet projects. The ties between Archewell, BetterUp, and the Aspen Institute suggest a web of financial relationships that prioritize personal gain over genuine charitable impact.
With the IRS potentially sniffing around Archewell’s finances, the future looks uncertain for the Sussexes. If the government grift train comes to a halt, how will Harry and Meghan sustain their lavish Montecito lifestyle? Will they be forced to downsize their mansion or sell off personal assets? Could Meghan return to writing ghostwritten memoirs to keep the cash flowing?
One thing is clear: The jig may be up for Harry and Meghan. As transparency concerns mount and financial scrutiny intensifies, the couple’s carefully curated image as global philanthropists is beginning to unravel. The IRS better sharpen their pencils, because this is one grift that just keeps on giving.
Harry and Meghan’s Archewell Foundation was supposed to be a beacon of hope and change. Instead, it’s become a symbol of financial opacity and questionable ethics. As the IRS and the public demand answers, the Sussexes will need to address these allegations head-on—or risk losing what little credibility they have left. For now, the world is watching, and the clock is ticking.
