Over the past six months, Meghan Markle has seen several high-profile figures and media outlets shift their stance on her. While once fiercely defended by supporters, many of them are now questioning the very persona they once championed. Journalist Liz Jones was the most notable defection, but she’s not alone—the likes of *The Cut*, *The Daily Beast*, and even royal commentator Jack Royston have noticeably distanced themselves from the Duchess of Sussex.
For many, the realization has been that the Meghan Markle they defended doesn’t actually exist. The carefully curated image she projected has been increasingly challenged by inconsistencies in her statements and actions. A growing number of people who once supported her now feel misled.
Among them is Canadian comedian Katherine Ryan, who previously spoke favorably of Meghan but has recently voiced skepticism. Ryan described Meghan’s public appearances as “manicured and very forced” and even questioned her infamous claim that she knew nothing about Prince Harry before meeting him. This, of course, has long been debated within royal-watching circles, with many believing that Meghan not only knew about Harry but had meticulously planned their relationship from the start.
One of the most unsettling aspects for critics is Meghan’s apparent obsession with Princess Diana. Some find it disturbing that she idolized Diana and then went on to marry her son. When laid out objectively, the narrative raises uncomfortable questions about Meghan’s motivations and authenticity.
Katherine Ryan also pointed out discrepancies in Meghan’s accounts of her childhood, which have evolved over time. Royal watchers have documented multiple contradictions in her past statements—something that has eroded trust among even her most dedicated supporters. As the truth becomes harder to ignore, even the so-called “Sussex Squad,” Meghan’s most vocal fan base, may eventually turn on her. Though some members are believed to be financially incentivized to promote her, their unwavering loyalty may not last forever.
A recurring issue with Meghan’s public persona is the sense that it constantly shifts. Ryan suggested that Meghan’s identity is almost “fluid,” changing depending on the situation, which could indicate deeper issues. This might also explain why Prince Harry often emphasizes mental health awareness—perhaps because he sees struggles within his own household.
Another key criticism Ryan raised was Meghan’s Hollywood-style presentation. She suggested that Meghan’s image appears overly polished and inauthentic, which aligns with previous criticisms that everything the Duchess does seems scripted and staged. Her public appearances are curated down to the last detail, making it difficult for people to connect with her on a genuine level.
While Meghan continues to maintain a luxurious lifestyle filled with brunches, wine glasses, and perfectly staged social media moments, more and more former supporters are seeing through the illusion. As time goes on, the question remains—how long can Meghan sustain this carefully crafted facade before more of her inner circle and fan base walk away?
