People magazine just released a new interview with Meghan Markle, and I’ve got to tell you, my jaw nearly hit the floor when I read it. Now, we all know People magazine might as well be called Harry and Meghan’s personal PR bulletin at this point, but even by their standards, this piece was something else.
Meghan supposedly curled up in bed with her sleeping 5-year-old son, Archie, on a cozy winter evening.
According to the piece, Meghan was savoring the stillness while Harry was away in Canada for Invictus Games business. As she’s working, Archie apparently stirs awake and says, “Don’t work too hard.” Meghan tells People it was “the sweetest thing,” but let me tell you, it’s heartbreaking if you read between the lines.
Think about it: why would a 5-year-old child say “Don’t work too hard” to their mother? Because they’re not seeing enough of her. When mom works hard, it means less time with them. “Please don’t be absent from my life” is pretty much the translation here. This isn’t some adorable anecdote—it’s a child begging for attention, feeling neglected.
Now, I’ve been covering this Sussex saga for years, and one of the most persistent questions in the Royal Watching community has been about these children. Where are they? Why are they never seen in public? Why do Harry and Meghan jet off on their fake world tours and never bring the kids along?
Think about it: William and Catherine bring their children to appropriate events. They balance privacy with allowing the public to see the future of the monarchy growing up. That’s how it’s done. But the Sussexes? These children are like ghosts—occasionally seen in blurry, bizarre photos, and then they vanish again.
Then there’s the other gem from the People magazine piece, where Meghan tries to portray herself as just one of the regular moms. She claims, “I have a couple of girlfriends up here,” describing them as stay-at-home moms and working women. I nearly spat out my tea reading that.
Normal jobs? Regular folks in Montecito? Let’s get real. The average home in Montecito costs upwards of $15 million. This is one of the most exclusive, wealthy enclaves in America. But there she goes again, trying to paint herself as relatable while living in a mansion.
She goes on: “We went from just connecting through our kids to having girls’ nights out, doing Pilates together.” Really? Because reliable reports from actual Montecito residents have consistently indicated that Meghan barely interacts with her community.
And then the article contradicts itself. In the same piece, a supposed friend mentions Meghan attending a low-key birthday party where she didn’t know anyone else there. Wait a minute—I thought she just said she had all these local mom friends? The inconsistencies are glaring.
What frustrates me—and so many Royal Watchers—is the constant manufacturing of an image that doesn’t align with reality. They want to be seen as global superstars, they want the glamour of royalty without the responsibility, they want privacy when it suits them and publicity when it benefits them.
Meanwhile, across the pond, we have Catherine and William, who have been rocks for the community, especially during this challenging time with King Charles and Catherine facing health issues. The contrast could not be more stark.
Catherine’s graceful handling of her health challenges, returning to work when able without fanfare, stands in sharp contrast to Meghan’s need for attention. One woman faces serious health issues with privacy and dignity; the other seems to need a magazine profile every few months.
Listen, I’ve been following the Royal Family for years, and I’ve never seen anything like this. It’s like watching a reality show that never ends, with continual plot twists that make less and less sense.
“Mama, don’t work too hard.” Those words from a child aren’t sweet—they’re a wake-up call. A child shouldn’t have to beg for their parents’ time and attention. And the fact that Meghan doesn’t seem to understand what those words mean is perhaps most troubling.
