This Michelin-starred chef has reportedly found himself in the crosshairs of none other than Meghan Markle after daring to speak his mind about her Netflix project, With Love, Meghan. And now, he claims to have received hundreds of death threats.
Jameson Stocks recently appeared on GB News, where he revealed that he was approached during New York Fashion Week last year to consult on what was described as a mystery lifestyle program. However, according to Stocks, he quickly turned down the offer because it just wasn’t for him. Now, isn’t that telling? A highly respected chef wanted nothing to do with this project before even knowing all the details. His instincts were clearly warning him about what would become a PR disaster.
What’s even more intriguing is that Stocks claims Netflix representatives subtly prepared him for the fact that their “star” was highly divisive. Yes, they knew exactly what they were getting into. They were essentially warning him that working with Meghan Markle would be stepping into a minefield. If that doesn’t tell you everything about how the industry views her, I don’t know what will.
Stocks’ reasoning for declining the project? Pure professional self-preservation. He stated, “Even if she produced a really great program—which I was quite skeptical of—I might still get slammed for being a part of it.” That’s incredibly telling. The mere association with Meghan Markle was enough to make a renowned chef fear for his reputation. What does that say about her standing in professional circles?
Stocks went even further, stating that he didn’t like the idea of “showing her how to do something and then it being forced and fake.” Let’s pause here. Those aren’t my words, folks—those are the words of a Michelin-starred chef describing what he anticipated working with Meghan would be like. And looking at the final product, was he wrong?
The Netflix show turned out to be exactly what Stocks predicted—forced and fake. It was a painfully obvious attempt to craft a Martha Stewart-style lifestyle guru image, but the contrived scenarios and stiff delivery made it clear that it was more about damage control than authenticity.
Now, Netflix has vehemently denied ever approaching Stocks, claiming that the show wasn’t even in development at the time he alleges this meeting took place. But here’s my question—why would he make this up? Stocks has nothing to gain from fabricating such a specific story. He’s an established chef with a stellar reputation, and speaking out against someone as controversial as Meghan Markle isn’t exactly a career booster. If anything, the backlash he’s facing proves just how risky it is to criticize her.
And the proof is in the pudding. Since sharing his truth, Stocks claims to have received hundreds of death threats. Hundreds. Let’s be clear—this man is being threatened with death simply for expressing his honest opinion about a television show. That is beyond unacceptable.
Now, let’s contrast this situation with how our beloved Catherine, Princess of Wales, handles criticism. Have you ever heard of someone receiving death threats for critiquing one of her projects? Of course not. That’s because Catherine conducts herself with grace and dignity. She understands that being in the public eye means accepting both praise and criticism. More importantly, she doesn’t unleash an army of social media supporters on those who express a different view.
Think back to when Catherine launched her Early Years Initiative—she faced some skepticism, but did she attack her critics? No. She simply continued her work, let the results speak for themselves, and earned respect through genuine dedication. That’s how a true royal behaves.
Let’s not forget King Charles and Queen Camilla, who have endured decades of criticism yet never resorted to intimidation tactics. They understand that leadership means facing scrutiny with resilience and class.
The irony here is staggering. Meghan and Harry left the UK claiming to seek freedom from media harassment, yet now, anyone who criticizes their projects faces vicious backlash. So, the free speech they demand for themselves doesn’t extend to those who disagree with them?
And this isn’t the first time professionals have been hesitant to work with them. Remember the high staff turnover at the Sussex household? The pattern is clear—people walk away because they see the red flags.
Stocks’ experience highlights a troubling culture of intimidation that follows Meghan and Harry wherever they go. They claim to be advocates for mental health, yet where is their statement condemning these threats? Their silence speaks volumes.
While Meghan and Harry seem focused on controlling the narrative, our working royals—William, Catherine, Charles, and Camilla—continue to embody true service. They don’t need to silence critics because their actions speak louder than words.
King Charles, despite facing health challenges, remains dedicated to his duty. Queen Camilla, once vilified, has won the public’s respect through consistent work and genuine warmth. They don’t engage in petty PR battles—they simply get on with the job.
It makes you wonder—what could Harry and Meghan achieve if they took the same approach? Instead of manipulating public perception, they could focus on real accomplishments. But sadly, they seem more invested in drama than legacy.
So, where do we go from here? I sincerely hope Jameson Stocks remains safe and continues speaking his truth. I also hope Netflix and the Sussexes address these serious allegations instead of dismissing them. More than anything, I hope this serves as a wake-up call about the toxic environment surrounding them.
For those of us who support the working royals, let’s keep our focus on the positive contributions of William, Catherine, Charles, and Camilla. They don’t need an army of online defenders—they simply need our continued support.
